International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 3
May-June 2026
Indexing Partners
A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE ROLE OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 IN RESTRUCTURING FAILING BUSINESSES IN INDIA
| Author(s) | Mr. Sambhav Jain, Ms. Smita Tyagi |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) marked a transformative shift in India’s insolvency framework by consolidating fragmented laws into a unified, time-bound mechanism for insolvency resolution. Prior to the enactment of the Code, insolvency proceedings in India were governed by multiple legislations such as SICA, RDDBFI Act and SARFAESI Act, resulting in delays, jurisdictional conflicts and inefficient recovery processes. The IBC introduced a creditor-in-control model and established the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) with the objective of maximizing the value of assets and promoting business restructuring instead of liquidation. This research paper critically examines the effectiveness of the IBC in restructuring distressed businesses in India. It analyses the institutional framework under the Code, the role of the Committee of Creditors (CoC), the significance of judicial interpretation, and the practical challenges faced during implementation. The paper also evaluates landmark judgments including Innoventive Industries Ltd. v. ICICI Bank, Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India and Essar Steel India Ltd. v. Satish Kumar Gupta which have shaped insolvency jurisprudence in India. The study further highlights concerns such as procedural delays, high liquidation rates, excessive haircuts accepted by creditors, infrastructural deficiencies in NCLTs, and limited participation of operational creditors. Comparative analysis with the insolvency frameworks of the United States and the United Kingdom demonstrates the strengths and weaknesses of the Indian model. The paper concludes that while the IBC has significantly improved India’s insolvency ecosystem and promoted financial discipline, continuous reforms and stronger institutional capacity are necessary to ensure effective restructuring of failing businesses in the long run. |
| Keywords | # KEYWORDS * Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) * Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) * Business Restructuring * Committee of Creditors (CoC) * Insolvency Resolution Professional (IRP/RP) * National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) * Corporate Debtor * Financial Creditors * Operational Creditors * Moratorium under Section 14 * Resolution Plan * Liquidation * Commercial Wisdom * Section 29A * Insolvency Jurisprudence * Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) * Creditor-in-Control Model * Bankruptcy Reforms * Asset Value Maximization * Indian Insolvency Framework |
| Field | Sociology > Education |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 3, May-June 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-05-18 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals