International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160     Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 8, Issue 3 (May-June 2026) Submit your research before last 3 days of June to publish your research paper in the issue of May-June.

Prison Law & Disability Rights

Author(s) Ms. Sonali Verma
Country India
Abstract In the context of prison administration and disabled persons' rights in India, there lies a significant contrast between what is provided constitutionally and practical realities. The Right to Persons with Disabilities (RPWD) Act, 2016, makes it imperative that states accommodate reasonably and ensure non-discrimination of the disabled. However, the majority of the state prison manuals still lag behind in terms of providing for the rights of disabled individuals housed in prisons. One of the main factual problems associated with disabled persons held in custody is the lack of proper infrastructure. Prisons are generally constructed for able-bodied individuals; therefore, disabled inmates experience difficulties in terms of mobility, especially when it comes to moving around or using the bathroom. Lack of ramps, accessibility features, or even elevators makes disabled inmates' lives very difficult, and they have to seek assistance from other inmates in performing everyday tasks, thus violating their right to dignity, guaranteed by Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.

Further to this point, one should consider the intersection between mental disability and criminal law, which represents an unpleasant factual situation. Indeed, based on numerous findings of different organizations from civil society, as well as observations made by the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB), there is an unusually high number of individuals suffering from psychosocial disabilities in prisons; however, India's correctional facilities lack specialists dealing with psychiatry issues. The majority of prisoners with intellectual or psychosocial disabilities face segregation or restraints under the pretense of safety and medical isolation. This practice, according to human rights organizations, amounts to torture and worsens the situation of detainees, thus violating the UNCRPD standards, to which India is a party.

From a legal standpoint, even though the judgments of the apex court have stated, for instance, in the case of Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration that basic human rights don’t desert a prisoner when he enters the jail gates, a specific jurisprudence catering to the needs of the disabled is practically weak. In the case of Re: Inhuman Conditions in 1382 Prisons, the apex court laid emphasis on reforms in general prison administration, but the “accommodation” required by the disabled is hardly attended to in practice. Moreover, medical parole is always denied or delayed because of administrative indifference.

Moreover, the lack of statistical records about the number of people with different kinds of disabilities in prison makes it extremely difficult for the government to make specific policies to address the needs of these prisoners. Furthermore, there is also an absence of correctional officers who have skills and knowledge that can enable them to deal with prisoners having auditory, visual or cognitive disabilities. The lack of this kind of personnel contributes to the failure of the prisoners with disabilities to take part in rehabilitation, education, and vocational programs inside prisons. Thus, it becomes apparent that being imprisoned while disabled means suffering not only loss of freedom but the loss of all other human rights as well.
Keywords • Dual Vulnerability (Incarceration and Disability) • Prison Rehabilitation • Educational and Vocational Programs • Basic Human Rights • Equitable Healthcare • Deprivation of Liberty
Published In Volume 8, Issue 3, May-June 2026
Published On 2026-05-23

Share this