International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 3
May-June 2026
Indexing Partners
Life Cycle Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Buildings for Sustainable Construction
| Author(s) | Mr. Aakil Khan, Dr. Deepak Verma |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Reinforced concrete (RC) is the most widely used structural material for buildings in the world. It is strong, durable, and flexible in design, but its production has a large environmental cost. Cement alone contributes approximately 7 to 8 percent of global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a scientific method used to measure the total environmental impact of a building from the production of raw materials to demolition and disposal. This review paper covers published journal studies on the LCA of RC buildings, focusing on three main areas: embodied energy, carbon emissions, and the role of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) and other sustainability strategies. Published data shows that the embodied energy of standard RC buildings ranges from 3.5 to 6.2 gigajoules per square meter of floor area, and embodied CO2 emissions range from 280 to 520 kilograms per square meter. Using fly ash at 30 percent replacement reduces CO2 by 25 to 35 percent. Using GGBFS at 50 percent replacement reduces CO2 by 40 to 54 percent. Operational energy during the building's service life is often 3 to 10 times larger than embodied energy over 50 years, yet many LCA studies still focus only on the material production phase. The review identifies six key research gaps including the absence of durability-based service life prediction in most studies, limited data from developing countries, and the routine exclusion of end-of-life recycling credits. Future research priorities are clearly identified. The paper provides reliable, data-supported guidance for architects, structural engineers, and policymakers who want to reduce the environmental impact of RC building construction. |
| Keywords | life cycle assessment; reinforced concrete; buildings; embodied energy; carbon emissions; supplementary cementitious materials; fly ash; GGBFS; sustainable construction; service life |
| Field | Engineering |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 3, May-June 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-05-29 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i03.79544 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals