International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 3
May-June 2026
Indexing Partners
“Brought Dead” Is Not a Cause of Death in India: A Medico-Legal, Clinical, and Public Health Appraisal
| Author(s) | Dr. Manish Gaur |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Background The term “brought dead” (BD) is widely used in Indian emergency departments to indicate the absence of vital signs at presentation. Although clinically convenient as a descriptive status, it is frequently and incorrectly documented as a cause of death, resulting in medico-legal ambiguity and distortion of mortality statistics. Objective To critically examine the conceptual, legal, clinical, and public health invalidity of recording “brought dead” as a cause of death within the Indian healthcare system. Methods A narrative medico-legal appraisal was undertaken using statutory provisions under the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, alongside international mortality reporting frameworks including the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and SNOMED CT terminology systems. Institutional observations from All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) and Pt. B.D. Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (PGIMS), Rohtak were reviewed contextually. Results “Brought dead” lacks etiological specificity and therefore does not satisfy legal or scientific requirements for cause-of-death certification. The term is not independently codable within ICD mortality classification systems and serves only as a contextual clinical descriptor within SNOMED CT. Case-based illustrations demonstrate that definitive pathological causes—including myocardial infarction, internal hemorrhage, poisoning, and intracranial hemorrhage—may remain concealed if BD is treated as a terminal diagnosis. Misclassification contributes to legal lapses, epidemiological inaccuracies, and compromised forensic investigation. Conclusion “Brought dead” should be regarded solely as a presentation status pending determination of the underlying cause of death through clinical evaluation or medico-legal investigation. Standardized death certification practices integrating ICD and SNOMED CT frameworks are essential to preserve legal integrity, clinical accountability, and reliability of mortality data. |
| Keywords | Brought dead; cause of death; medico-legal investigation; ICD; SNOMED CT; mortality certification; forensic medicine; emergency medicine; India |
| Field | Sociology > Health |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 3, May-June 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-05-27 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i03.79625 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals