International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 3
May-June 2026
Indexing Partners
Coaching Style Preferences and Attitude of Student Athletes
| Author(s) | Mr. Edward Louie Del Rosario Salcedo, Dr. Fausto Jr. Camania Romero |
|---|---|
| Country | Philippines |
| Abstract | This study examined the influence of coaching style preferences on the attitudes of student athletes officially recognized under the Local Government Unit (LGU) of Naga City for the school year 2025–2026. Specifically, it identified the coaching style preferences along autocratic, democratic, and laissez-faire dimensions; measure athlete attitudes in terms of value for purpose and meaning, feedback-driven orientation, tech-savviness and visual learning, mental health awareness, and desire for autonomy and inclusion; assess the significant relationship between coaching styles and athlete attitudes; determine the extent of influence of coaching styles on athlete attitudes; and develop an LGU-sponsored training program to enhance coaching practices. The 185 respondents were selected through purposive sampling, and a descriptive-correlational research design was employed. Data analysis utilized Weighted Mean, Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient (r), and Coefficient of Determination (r²). Athletes prefer democratic coaching, moderately accept autocratic coaching, and reject laissez-faire coaching; they prioritize purpose and feedback, moderately value autonomy and mental health awareness, and place less emphasis on tech-savvy learning. Democratic coaching strongly aligns with athletes' needs; autocratic coaching fosters autonomy and adaptability; and laissez-faire coaching supports feedback responsiveness and psychological well-being. An LGU-sponsored program was developed to enhance coaching effectiveness and athlete development. |
| Keywords | Democratic coaching, student-athlete attitudes, descriptive-correlational design, LGU training program. |
| Field | Sociology > Sports |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 3, May-June 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-05-29 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i03.79773 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals