International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160   •   Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 8, Issue 3 (May-June 2026) Submit your research before last 3 days of June to publish your research paper in the issue of May-June.
Submit Research Paper Join as a Reviewer

Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker TurnItIn

Call for Paper

Volume 8 Issue 3
May-June 2026

Submit your research paper

Indexing Partners
Academia Advanced Sciences Index Bielefeld Academic Search Engine CiteSeer DRJI Google Scholar Independent Search Engine & Directory Network ISI (International Scientific Indexing) Issuu Mendeley Research Networks
RefSeek ResearcherId - Thomson Reuters ResearchGate Scirus Scribd Semantic Scholar UTeM - Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Wiki for Call for Papers WorldCat Zenodo

Judicial Activism Or Judicial Vacuum? A Doctrinal Analysis of Whistleblowers Protection Through Indian Case Law (2011-2025)

Author(s) Ms. Somya Soni
Country India
Abstract Public officials and corruption are often exposed by “whistleblowers” but their legal protection in India is weak and are not always followed. The purpose of this Article is to analyse whether the judicial approach to the protection of whistleblowers is a true judicial activism or judicial vacuum in practice through a doctrinal study of the Indian case law from 2011 to 2025. It examines the interpretation of the Right to Information Act, 2005, the Whistleblowers Protection Act, 2014, constitutional rights under Article 19 and 21 along with remedies under Article 32 and 226 by the Supreme Court and High Courts. The analysis shows that, although courts often use "activist language" and validate whistleblowing's public-interest value, they have yet to convert that language into effective and easily enforceable protections for whistleblowers against retaliation, harassment, and institutional indifference. It identifies gaps in the complaint redressal system, non-framing and/or non-implementation of statutory rules and the inability of the judiciary to establish comprehensive protection systems. It concludes that this blend of rhetorical activism and structural paralysis has resulted in a “judicial vacuum” in whistleblower protection and suggests doctrinal and legislative changes to bring judicial discourse more in line with effective protection for whistleblowers against maladministration and corruption in India.
Keywords Whistleblowers Protection, Transparency, Confidenciality, Public Interest
Published In Volume 8, Issue 3, May-June 2026
Published On 2026-05-29
DOI https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i03.79853
View / Download PDF File

Share this



E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef

CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.

IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr

Downloads
Research Paper Format Copyright Permission Form and Undertaking Form Cover Page Vol 8 Isu 3Cover Page Vol 8 Isu 2Cover Page Vol 8 Isu 2

All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.

CC-BY-SA Open Access

About IJFMR
Fees & Payment
Current Issue
Publication Archive 		Submit Research Paper
Track Submission Status
Publication Guidelines
Publication Ethics
Peer Review & Plagiarism 		Join as a Reviewer
Editors & Reviewers
Reviewer Referral Program
Get Reviewer Membership Certi. 		Website/Journal Policies
Usage Policy
Content Policies
Privacy Policy
Contact Us +91-9687-828-838 editor@ijfmr.com
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals