International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 4
July-August 2026
Indexing Partners
Laws governing Investor Protection vis-a-vis state protection in international law- critical analysis on U.S, India, Australia and E.U
| Author(s) | Ms. Jahnvi Pandey, Prof. Dr. Lakshmi Priya Vinjamuri |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | International investment law seeks to balance two competing interests: the protection of foreign investors and the preservation of the sovereign regulatory autonomy of host States. This tension has intensified through the rise of Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs), Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS), and the growing scrutiny of State measures affecting public welfare, environmental protection, public health, and national security. While traditional investment treaties strongly favored investors through standards such as Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET), protection against expropriation, Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) treatment, and access to international arbitration, recent treaty practice increasingly recognizes the State’s right to regulate in the public interest. This paper critically compares the approaches of the United States, India, Australia, and the European Union toward balancing investor rights and State sovereignty. The paper argues that while the United States continues to support a relatively investor-friendly model, India has moved strongly toward protecting State autonomy after adverse arbitral experiences. Australia adopts a middle path with selective support for ISDS, whereas the European Union is developing a reformed framework centered on investment courts and stronger public policy carve-outs. These differences reveal an evolving global investment regime increasingly shaped by public interest considerations, sustainable development, and regulatory flexibility |
| Keywords | Investor protection, Foreign Direct Investment , Treaty |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 3, May-June 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-06-04 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals