International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 4
July-August 2026
Indexing Partners
Beyond the Score: A Systematic Literature Review of Explainable Artificial Intelligence Frameworks for Promoting Equity in Automated Educational Assessment
| Author(s) | Ms. Marites Dahilog Habagat, Leslyn Reazol |
|---|---|
| Country | Philippines |
| Abstract | The application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in educational assessment has revolutionized the way educational institutions grade and provide feedback. Automated assessment systems promise significant gains in efficiency and scalability, but concerns have been raised about transparency, fairness, and algorithmic bias. In particular, concerns have been raised about the extent to which learners and educators can understand, justify and contest automated decisions when opaque ‘black box’ models are used. This work is a systematic literature review of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) frameworks and their potential to support the development of equity in automated educational assessment systems . We systematically searched peer reviewed studies from 2020 to 2025, using pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Through a rigorous screening process 25 studies were selected for detailed analysis. Their findings suggest that historical training data can encode algorithmic bias within automated assessment models, which can marginalize learners from diverse linguistic, cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds. Moreover, the application of XAI techniques, such as visualization of feature importance, decision trees and explanation interfaces, was found to further enhance the transparency and trust of the stakeholders. We however find that explainability is not sufficient for fairness. The literature places a great deal of emphasis on Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) frameworks, where decision-making authority remains with educators, and AI systems function as decision support tools. The authors conclude that successful implementation of the AI-assisted assessment depends on a combination of technical transparency, ethical governance and human oversight. Educational institutions, especially in the Philippine context, are recommended to promote equitable and accountable AI use in assessment practices. |
| Keywords | Explainable Artificial Intelligence, Automated Assessment, Educational Equity, Algorithmic Bias, Human-in-the-Loop, Educational Technology |
| Field | Computer > Artificial Intelligence / Simulation / Virtual Reality |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 3, May-June 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-06-11 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i03.81089 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals