International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 4
July-August 2026
Indexing Partners
Verifying LLM-Generated Data-Pipeline Transformations: A Hybrid Static–Semantic Approach for Leakage and Data-Quality Faults
| Author(s) | Ms. Veena G |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate data-pipeline and feature engineering transformations from natural-language specifications. This introduces a new and under-examined risk surface: transformations that are syntactically valid and schema-correct yet semantically wrong, silently injecting temporal leakage, granularity errors, join fan-out, silent row loss, and data-quality defects. Existing text-to-SQL verifiers target the correctness of a single natural-language-to-SQL query and do not address transformation- and pipeline-level data-flow faults, which today are caught only reactively—after a model trained on a leaking feature posts implausible offline accuracy. We make three contributions. First, we define a six-category fault taxonomy for generated transformations grounded in real feature-engineering failure modes. Second, we propose a lightweight hybrid verifier that combines static dataflow analysis with semantic execution checks, including a gold-free metamorphic leakage test: removing future rows must not change any historical feature value. Third, we build a fault-injection benchmark on synthetic and real (Rossmann Store Sales) data and evaluate against a static validation baseline and a strong LLM-as-judge baseline. The hybrid verifier attains perfect precision (no false alarms), is deterministic and inexpensive, and detects structural, temporal, and granularity faults; a strong LLM-as-judge attains higher overall recall on semantically subtle faults but over-flags correct transformations and is blind to granularity errors. The two approaches are complementary, motivating combined verification for trustworthy LLM-generated data pipelines. |
| Keywords | data engineering, feature engineering, data leakage, LLM code generation, software verification, data quality, trustworthy AI. |
| Field | Computer > Artificial Intelligence / Simulation / Virtual Reality |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 3, May-June 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-06-13 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i03.81173 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals