International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
ISC-AISGF-TBRF
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICRTET-4
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
Current Assessment Tools, Integration, and Clinical Decision-Making in Written Language Disorder (Dysgraphia): A Pilot Study
| Author(s) | Ms. Shivani Saxena, Dr Rohila Shetty, Dr Vini Abhijith Gupta |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Written Language Disorder (WLD), or dysgraphia, remains an underexamined component of routine speech–language evaluation in India, where culturally and linguistically appropriate assessment tools are limited. The present pilot study examined the assessment practices, integration strategies, clinical decision-making, and self-reported confidence of speech–language pathologists (SLPs) regarding WLD, and explored whether years of clinical experience influence these parameters. A cross-sectional survey was completed by 48 practicing SLPs in India, stratified into three experience cohorts: less than 1 year, less than 5 years, and more than 5 years. Participants completed two Likert-scale subscales and six categorical items. Data were analyzed using chi-square tests and Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA, with Dwass–Steel–Critchlow–Fligner post hoc comparisons. Use of informal writing tasks differed significantly across cohorts, with less-experienced SLPs using such tasks less frequently than more experienced peers; use of formal standardized tools also differed across cohorts on the chi-square test. Other domains did not differ significantly. Categorical findings revealed that 54.2% identified lack of standardized Indian tools as the major barrier, and 12.5% reported omitting written language assessment because they considered oral language to be more important. Endorsement of the need for standardized Indian guidelines was near-unanimous. These findings indicate that standardized, locally validated assessment of dysgraphia remains an unmet need in Indian speech–language pathology and underscore the need for context-specific tool development and clinical training. |
| Keywords | dysgraphia, written language disorder, speech–language pathologists, assessment practices, clinical decision-making, India |
| Field | Medical / Pharmacy |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 3, May-June 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-06-23 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i03.82050 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals