International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160     Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 8, Issue 4 (July-August 2026) Submit your research before last 3 days of August to publish your research paper in the issue of July-August.

Rebuttal to Lann N. Ramez's

Author(s) Mr. Mohammad Shafiq Khan
Country India
Abstract The background of the theory of special relativity is discussed in the introduction of Mohammad Shafiq Khan (2012). Lorentz transformation which Einstein derived in his paper Albert Einstein (1905) fraudulently from the ‘equation of trickery’ just to claim the credit of introduction of postulate of constancy of velocity of light irrespective of linear uniform motion of the source and the observer. Now then there are three transformations firstly Woldemar Voigt transformation, secondly Lorentz or Einstein’s transformation and thirdly my transformation though all the three transformations are mathematically correct. The decision as to which transformation is correct can be taken on the basis of experimental investigation and actual state of existence of the physical universe. This exercise has been accomplished in the paper Mohammad Shafiq Khan (2012) and it has been shown that only time dilation without involvement of space is correct. The constancy of velocity of light irrespective of the linear uniform motion of the observer is weird and against the mathematical axioms mathematical results need not be accepted against the physical and factual state of existence of space.
The papers written by Lann N. Ramez are concerned with the derivation of ‘equation of trickery’ by Einstein and one of the equations in Mohammad Shafiq Khan (2012-Elixir-I). Lann N. Ramez should have known that rebuttal, reply or commentary of the papers published in peer-reviewed journals, wherein the contents of the papers are claimed to be incorrect, must be published in the peer-reviewed journal. After having realised that both the papers are preposterous, absurd, as a consequence of not understanding my papers and not being published in peer-reviewed journal I deemed it proper not to pay any attention to these papers and did not write the rebuttal. Now since I am in the process of publication of the second edition of my book ‘Natural World Order and The Islamic Thought ’, wherein this issue is also discussed I do not want anybody to raise fingers because common readers do not know that rebuttal, reply or commentary of the papers published in the peer-reviewed journals have to be published in the peer-reviewed journal. Under these circumstances, I have written the rebuttal which would demolish the validity of the preposterous and absurd papers of Lann N. Ramez. It is a matter of record that Lann N. Ramez (2018-II) has been submitted to viXra under his name but got published anonymously, whereas in the General Science Journal, he has got it published under his name. All the three links are given in the references
Keywords Einstein, fraudulant derivation, equation of trickery
Field Physics
Published In Volume 8, Issue 4, July-August 2026
Published On 2026-07-04

Share this