Section 73 Versus Section 74 of The CGST Act, 2017 : The Critical Distinction Between Tax Default and Fraud and The Limits of Penal Jurisdiction

Vipin Kumar Singhal; Dr. Dharmendra Kumar

doi:10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i04.83065

Section 73 Versus Section 74 of The CGST Act, 2017 : The Critical Distinction Between Tax Default and Fraud and The Limits of Penal Jurisdiction

Author(s)	Mr. Vipin Kumar Singhal, Dr. Dharmendra Kumar
Country	India
Abstract	There is a distinction in India's GST enforcement architecture that ought to be obvious, is plainly stated in the statute, and has been repeatedly affirmed by the Supreme Court and yet is routinely ignored in practice. Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 deals with recovery of taxes not paid or short paid in ordinary cases, where there is no allegation of dishonesty. Section 74 deals with recovery in cases tainted by fraud, willful misstatement, or suppression of facts with the specific intent to evade tax. The first carries a three-year limitation and a maximum discretionary penalty of ten percent. The second carries a five-year limitation and a mandatory penalty of one hundred percent of the tax demand. These are not two points on a severity spectrum; they represent two distinct jurisdictions, with Section 74 reserved exclusively for the deliberate wrongdoer. The problem this paper addresses is that adjudicating authorities have developed a habit of reaching for Section 74 in cases that call, at most, for Section 73 invoking fraud and suppression as template conclusions rather than as proven facts, and treating every audit-detected shortfall as evidence of a concealment that 'would otherwise have gone unnoticed'. This conflation of non-compliance with fraud is legally wrong, constitutionally troubling, and commercially damaging.
Keywords	Section 73, Section 74, CGST Act 2017, Fraud, Willful Misstatement, Suppression of Facts, Mens Rea, Bona Fide Belief, Classification Dispute, Extended Period of Limitation, GST Penalty, Tax Evasion, Self-Correction, Self-Assessment
Published In	Volume 8, Issue 4, July-August 2026
Published On	2026-07-04
DOI	https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i04.83065

View / Download PDF File

E-ISSN 2582-2160

doi

CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr

Downloads

Research Paper Format Copyright Permission Form and Undertaking Form Cover Page Vol 8 Isu 3 Cover Page Vol 8 Isu 2 Cover Page Vol 8 Isu 2

All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.

CC-BY-SA

About IJFMR Fees & Payment Current Issue Publication Archive	Submit Research Paper Track Submission Status Publication Guidelines Publication Ethics Peer Review & Plagiarism	Join as a Reviewer Editors & Reviewers Reviewer Referral Program Get Reviewer Membership Certi.	Website/Journal Policies Usage Policy Content Policies Privacy Policy

Contact Us		+91-9687-828-838	editor@ijfmr.com

International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Section 73 Versus Section 74 of The CGST Act, 2017 : The Critical Distinction Between Tax Default and Fraud and The Limits of Penal Jurisdiction

Share this