International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 4
July-August 2026
Indexing Partners
Algorithmic Trading and Market Fairness: Assessing Whether Indian Securities Regulation Can Protect Retail Investors in Machine-Speed Markets
| Author(s) | Ms. Sanya Singh |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Algorithmic trading and the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have reconstituted securities markets from human-paced environments into machine-speed systems in which orders are generated and executed in microseconds; in India, algorithmic orders now account for a majority of turnover in several market segments. This article asks whether Indian securities regulation, and the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) in particular, is equipped not only to preserve market integrity and systemic stability but also to protect retail investors from the structural disadvantage that machine-speed markets produce. Drawing on a comparative survey of algorithmic-trading regulation in the United States, the European Union, the United Kingdom and Singapore, and on the literature concerning app-based trading platforms and AI in corporate accountability, it argues that efficiency alone is an inadequate measure of a fair market. While automation can narrow spreads, deepen liquidity and sharpen price discovery, it also amplifies volatility, enables manipulation through spoofing and layering, and entrenches infrastructural inequality between institutional and retail participants — a concern made concrete by SEBI’s own finding that the great majority of individual derivatives traders lose money. The article contends that SEBI’s framework, including its June 2025 AI/ML consultation and its February 2025 retail-algorithm circular, remains oriented towards integrity and systemic risk rather than retail fairness. After weighing the principal objections, it identifies doctrinal and policy gaps and proposes a retail-fairness framework of risk-based registration, model governance, human oversight, gamification limits, liability rules and a structured compensation mechanism. |
| Keywords | Algorithmic trading · High-frequency trading · SEBI · Retail investor protection · Market fairness · AI/ML governance |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 4, July-August 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-07-12 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i04.83407 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals