International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 4
July-August 2026
Indexing Partners
Beyond the Default Male User: A Literature Review of Feminist Perspectives in Human-Centred Design
| Author(s) | Prapti Singhal |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Human-Centred Design (HCD) is widely recognised as a design philosophy that prioritises users’ needs, experiences, and interactions throughout the development of products, services, and systems. Despite its user-focused principles, traditional HCD has frequently relied on the assumption of a universal or “average” user, inadvertently treating the male body, experiences, and perspectives as the default standard. This structural bias has contributed to the exclusion or underrepresentation of women, LGBTQ+ individuals, persons with disabilities, older adults, and other marginalised communities, resulting in products and technologies that inadequately address the diversity of human needs. Evidence from healthcare, automotive safety, digital technologies, ergonomics, and artificial intelligence demonstrates that default male assumptions can produce unequal outcomes with significant social, economic, and health consequences. This literature review critically examines feminist perspectives on Human-Centred Design and explores how feminist theories challenge the concept of the “default male user.” Drawing upon interdisciplinary literature from human–computer interaction, design studies, feminist theory, healthcare, ergonomics, psychology, and artificial intelligence, the review synthesises existing research on gender bias in design, inclusive and participatory design methodologies, intersectionality, feminist ethics of care, and design justice. It further evaluates the limitations of conventional Human-Centred Design frameworks and analyses emerging approaches that advocate for the active inclusion of historically marginalised users throughout the design process. The review argues that truly human-centred design cannot be achieved through gender-neutral assumptions or average-user models. Instead, diversity, equity, accessibility, and intersectionality must be recognised as fundamental design principles rather than supplementary considerations. By integrating feminist perspectives into Human-Centred Design, designers can better identify hidden biases, improve representation in research and testing, and develop products, services, and technologies that are safer, more accessible, and more equitable for diverse populations. Ultimately, this review contributes to the growing body of scholarship advocating for a shift from designing for an assumed universal user toward designing with and for diverse human experiences. |
| Keywords | Human-Centred Design, feminist design, default male user, gender bias, inclusive design, intersectionality, human–computer interaction, design justice, participatory design. |
| Field | Computer > Design |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 4, July-August 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-07-11 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals