International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160   •   Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 8, Issue 4 (July-August 2026) Submit your research before last 3 days of August to publish your research paper in the issue of July-August.
Submit Research Paper Join as a Reviewer

Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker TurnItIn

Call for Paper

Volume 8 Issue 4
July-August 2026

Submit your research paper

Indexing Partners
Academia Advanced Sciences Index Bielefeld Academic Search Engine CiteSeer DRJI Google Scholar Independent Search Engine & Directory Network ISI (International Scientific Indexing) Issuu Mendeley Research Networks
RefSeek ResearcherId - Thomson Reuters ResearchGate Scirus Scribd Semantic Scholar UTeM - Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Wiki for Call for Papers WorldCat Zenodo

Brazil's ENAMED and the Governance of AI-Supported Exam Preparation: A Conceptual Policy Analysis

Author(s) Vinicius Cogo Destefani, Matheus Feliciano da Costa Ferreira, Afranio Cogo Destefani
Country Brazil
Abstract Brazil's National Examination for the Assessment of Medical Training (ENAMED) creates a policy setting in which a national assessment can influence student preparation, institutional priorities, and access to residency selection. At the same time, generative artificial intelligence and adaptive learning tools are becoming readily available to medical students. This conceptual policy analysis asks how medical schools should govern AI-supported preparation before high-stakes incentives define its educational purpose. We use a targeted narrative analysis of official ENAMED documents and selected literature on high-stakes testing, medical assessment, artificial intelligence in medical education, and faculty development. We argue that personalisation can become adaptive test coaching when systems optimise visible examination performance without evidence of transfer to clinical reasoning, feedback literacy, or professional judgement. Governance should therefore address educational purpose, evidence standards, transparency, human oversight, equity, data protection, conflicts of interest, and continuous monitoring. Medical schools should align AI-supported preparation with programmatic assessment, prepare faculty and learners to evaluate outputs critically, and keep consequential decisions under accountable human control. ENAMED offers an opportunity to establish these safeguards early. The appropriate question is not whether students will use AI for preparation, but whether institutions will shape that use toward learning and public accountability rather than narrow score optimisation.
Keywords Medical Education, Artificial Intelligence, Educational Assessment, High-Stakes Testing, Governance, ENAMED, Brazil
Field Medical / Pharmacy
Published In Volume 8, Issue 4, July-August 2026
Published On 2026-08-14
DOI https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i04.84125
View / Download PDF File

Share this



E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef

CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr

Downloads
Research Paper Format Copyright Permission Form and Undertaking Form

All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.

CC-BY-SA Open Access

About IJFMR
Fees & Payment
Current Issue
Publication Archive 		Submit Research Paper
Track Submission Status
Publication Guidelines
Publication Ethics
Peer Review & Plagiarism 		Join as a Reviewer
Editors & Reviewers
Reviewer Referral Program
Get Reviewer Membership Certi. 		Website/Journal Policies
Usage Policy
Content Policies
Privacy Policy
Contact Us +91-9687-828-838 editor@ijfmr.com
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals