International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICRTET-4
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
Faith, Forgiveness, and Reconciliation in Women’s Narratives of the Rwandan Genocide: A Comparative Reading of Left to Tell and A Long Way from Paradise
| Author(s) | Ms. Nisarga M, Dr. Veena M K |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | This article comparatively examines Immaculée Ilibagiza’s Left to Tell and Leah Chishugi’s A Long Way from Paradise to investigate how women survivors narrate faith, forgiveness, and reconciliation after the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda. Drawing on feminist life-writing, trauma studies, and transitional-justice scholarship, it argues that the memoirs construct two distinct but intersecting models of restorative agency. In Left to Tell, faith is principally an interior discipline: prayer reorganizes fear and rage, enables unilateral forgiveness, and supports a redemptive vision of national healing. In A Long Way from Paradise, faith is more ambivalent and relational. Chishugi’s sense of divine abandonment is not resolved by doctrine alone; it is gradually reconstituted through interracial religious community, surrogate kinship, encounter with a perpetrator, and humanitarian work with conflict-affected women and children. Both memoirs refuse a simple equivalence between forgiveness and forgetting. Yet their differences expose the ethical danger of making survivors responsible for reconciliation without truth, accountability, safety, institutional repentance, and material repair. The article proposes a survivor-centred reconciliation continuum comprising intrapersonal release, interpersonal recognition, and sociopolitical justice. It concludes that faith can sustain women’s post-genocide agency, but only when forgiveness remains voluntary and when spiritual narratives are held in productive tension with memory, gender justice, and legal responsibility. |
| Field | Sociology > Linguistic / Literature |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 4, July-August 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-07-22 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i04.84317 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals