International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 4
July-August 2026
Indexing Partners
Compliant Flexure Mechanisms for Precision Optical Payload Alignment in Space Applications: A Review
| Author(s) | Mr. Jay G. Chavda |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Precision alignment of optical payloads in spacedepends, more and more, on mechanisms that movewithout touching — flexures instead of bearings, elastic deformation instead of sliding contact. Thisreview pulls together where that field currently stands:how flexure hinges get modeled, how designers stop motion in one axis from leaking into another, howthermal cycling in orbit complicates all of it, and whatmaterials actually hold up under the combined weightof stiffness, precision, and mass constraints thatspaceflight hardware demands. Thirty-two studiesspanning hinge-level compliance modeling, multi-axisdecoupling architectures, thermal-structural analysisof space opticalsystems, and aerospace materialselection are surveyed and organized around four themes. What emerges is a field that has solvedseveral of these problems well in isolation but rarelyall at once. Most published designs handle two axesor push all the way to six, with comparatively littleattention paid to the five-axis middle ground thatmany real optical payloads actually need. Thermaland mechanical loading are usually validatedseparately rather than together, even though flight hardware experiences both simultaneously, andlaunch-phase dynamic loading is engaged with evenless consistently than either. This review maps outwhat has been established, points to where the gapssit, and argues that closing them requires treatingflexure geometry, mounting stiffness, and thermalbehavior as one coupled design problem rather thanthree separate ones. |
| Keywords | Compliant mechanism, flexure hinge, precision positioning, space optics, thermo-structural analysis, cross-axis decoupling, review. |
| Field | Engineering |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 4, July-August 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-07-28 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i04.84411 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals