Governing Synthetic Reality: Comparative Perspectives on Deepfake Regulation, Online Safety, and Democratic Speech

Swagatika Panigrahi; Shyamalal Chandra Sekhar Mishra; Maglin M Raja; Komal Agarwal

Governing Synthetic Reality: Comparative Perspectives on Deepfake Regulation, Online Safety, and Democratic Speech

Author(s)	Dr. Swagatika Panigrahi, Mr. Shyamalal Chandra Sekhar Mishra, Mr. Maglin M Raja, Ms. Komal Agarwal
Country	India
Abstract	Generative artificial intelligence has advanced quickly enough that synthetic audio and video content now often cannot be told apart from genuine recordings. Lawmakers have struggled to keep pace with this shift, a difficulty this paper refers to as the pacing problem, where legal frameworks are drafted and debated far slower than the technology they attempt to govern. Three competing concerns pull regulatory efforts in different directions: the need to protect individuals from online harm and privacy violations, the constitutional or normative commitment to free expression, and the interest in preserving fair and informed democratic elections. To understand how different legal systems have responded to these pressures, this paper compares three regulatory paradigms. The European Union relies on a risk tiered structure established under the AI Act, paired with platform accountability duties introduced by the Digital Services Act. The United States, by contrast, has produced a patchwork of state level statutes shaped heavily by First Amendment doctrine, resulting in narrower, sector specific rules rather than a single federal framework. China has taken a security driven approach, requiring mandatory labelling of synthetic content and real name verification under rules issued by the Cyberspace Administration of China. Working through these three models, the paper argues that a blanket ban on synthetic media would raise serious constitutional concerns and would likely suppress legitimate uses of the technology alongside harmful ones. It instead makes the case for a layered system built on provenance and consent, one that combines technical measures such as the C2PA watermarking standard with binding platform moderation obligations and criminal liability reserved for clearly malicious uses. Building on this comparative groundwork, the paper sets out a Tri Pillar Synthetic Reality Governance Model meant to give policymakers a workable path between safety, individual rights, and what is technically achievable.
Keywords	Deepfake Regulation, Synthetic Media Governance, Generative Adversarial Networks, Online Safety, Democratic Speech, Comparative AI Law
Published In	Volume 8, Issue 4, July-August 2026
Published On	2026-08-02

View / Download PDF File

About IJFMR Fees & Payment Current Issue Publication Archive	Submit Research Paper Track Submission Status Publication Guidelines Publication Ethics Peer Review & Plagiarism	Join as a Reviewer Editors & Reviewers Reviewer Referral Program Get Reviewer Membership Certi.	Website/Journal Policies Usage Policy Content Policies Privacy Policy

Contact Us		+91-9687-828-838	editor@ijfmr.com

International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Governing Synthetic Reality: Comparative Perspectives on Deepfake Regulation, Online Safety, and Democratic Speech

Share this