International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 4
July-August 2026
Indexing Partners
Comparing Human and AI Decision-Making Strategies in Strategic Games Using Reinforcement Learning
| Author(s) | Ziad Karim Tabbouche |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Strategic games have long served as experimental environments for studying intelligence, adaptation, and decision-making. Recent advances in reinforcement learning (RL) have enabled artificial intelligence systems to surpass human performance in complex games such as chess, Go, poker, and multiplayer strategy environments. Despite these achievements, significant differences remain between human and AI decision-making processes. Humans rely on intuition, bounded rationality, emotional judgment, and contextual reasoning, whereas reinforcement learning agents optimize actions through iterative reward maximization and policy learning. This paper presents a comparative analysis of human and AI decision-making strategies in strategic games using reinforcement learning frameworks. The study evaluates behavioral patterns, strategic adaptation, exploration mechanisms, and risk management across multiple competitive game environments. Experimental findings indicate that reinforcement learning agents achieve superior consistency and long-term optimization in structured settings, while human players demonstrate greater flexibility and adaptability under uncertain or novel conditions. The paper further examines how self-play learning, reward shaping, and opponent modeling influence AI strategy formation. Results suggest that hybrid systems integrating human-like reasoning with reinforcement learning optimization may provide more robust strategic decision-making models for future artificial intelligence applications. |
| Keywords | Reinforcement Learning, Strategic Games, Human Decision-Making, Artificial Intelligence, Multi-Agent Systems, Game Theory, Deep Reinforcement Learning, Human-AI Interaction, Strategic Reasoning, Adaptive Learning |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 4, July-August 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-08-10 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals