International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICRTET-4
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
The Dramaturgy of Dissent: Social and Cultural Critique in the Select Plays of Girish Karnad
| Author(s) | G. Yadagiri |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Girish Karnad (1938–2019) occupies a central place in postcolonial Indian theatre for his sustained use of myth, folklore, and history as instruments of social and political critique. This paper examines the dramaturgy of dissent across four representative plays—Tughlaq (1964), Hayavadana (1971), Naga-Mandala (1988), and Tale-Danda (1990)—arguing that Karnad's recourse to pre-modern narrative forms functions not as escapist antiquarianism but as a strategic distancing device through which contemporary anxieties surrounding political authority, caste, and gender are refracted and interrogated. Drawing on Aparna Bhargava Dharwadker's account of the post-independence Indian dramatic canon and Erin B. Mee's analysis of the “Theatre of Roots” movement, the study situates Karnad's dramaturgical choices within the broader project of decolonizing Indian theatrical form while resisting straightforward cultural nationalism. Close readings of Tughlaq's historical allegory of failed idealism, Tale-Danda's staging of caste violence and religious reform, and the gendered subjectivities dramatized in Hayavadana and Naga-Mandala reveal a consistent authorial strategy: the deployment of inherited narrative material to expose the instabilities of modern Indian nationhood. The paper concludes that Karnad's theatre constitutes a coherent dramaturgy of dissent in which myth and history become durable instruments of contemporary social critique. |
| Keywords | Girish Karnad; Indian theatre; dramaturgy of dissent; postcolonial drama; myth and history; caste and gender critique. |
| Published In | Volume 6, Issue 3, May-June 2024 |
| Published On | 2024-06-11 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i03.85088 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals