International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 4
July-August 2026
Indexing Partners
Clinical AgentOps: Runtime Governance for Autonomous AI Healthcare Agents
| Author(s) | Kamal Singh Bisht, Raj Kumar |
|---|---|
| Country | United States |
| Abstract | Generative AI is entering clinical practice not as a predictor but as an actor. Contemporary healthcare deployments increasingly involve agents: language-model systems that plan over multiple steps,retrieve patient context, invoke tools, write to the electronic health record, and coordinate with otheragents. Health AI governance, however, remains overwhelmingly design-time. Premarket review,transparency labels, and reporting standards evaluate a model artifact under the assumption that behavior is a stable property of that artifact. Agentic systems violate this assumption: their effective behavioris constituted at runtime by the composition of instructions, retrieved context, tool affordances, mem ory, and inter-agent interaction, none of which is fixed at approval time. This paper proposes ClinicalAgentOps, a framework that relocates governance from the artifact into the agent’s execution path. Itcontributes an explicit argument from the premises of design-time assurance to the necessity of inpath control, stated with its falsifying conditions; a runtime failure taxonomy for clinical agents inwhich the unit of analysis is the action trajectory rather than the input–output pair; a two-dimensionalmodel treating autonomy as a graduated, revocable, per-action grant indexed by a Clinical Action RiskTier, with a stated derivation rule from which the minimum control set for each (tier, autonomy) pairfollows; a five-plane reference architecture spanning authorization, execution, observation, assurance,and accountability; a clinical agent trace schema extending emerging generative-AI telemetry conventions with attribution, evidence, and oversight attributes, together with governance metrics computablefrom it; and a mapping from framework components to obligations under prevailing risk-management, privacy, and medical-device regimes. This is a framework and position paper: claims about controlefficacy are advanced as falsifiable hypotheses with the study designs that would test them, not asresults |
| Keywords | Agentic AI, AIGovernance, Clinical Decision Support, Runtime Assurance, LLMObservability, Health Informatics, AI Safety, Human Oversight, Electronic Health Records (EHR), Medical Device Regula tion |
| Field | Medical / Pharmacy |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 4, July-August 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-08-06 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i04.85225 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals