International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 4
July-August 2026
Indexing Partners
The Legal Relationship Between India’s ART Act and Surrogacy Act: Regulatory Overlap, Normative Inconsistency and a Framework for Reform
| Author(s) | Babita Agrawalla, Dr. Shyam Lal, Dr. Lalit Kumar Dev, Dr. Sujata Dash |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | The Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act 2021 (ART Act) and the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act 2021 (Surrogacy Act) are companion bills for the new laws, but there is no coherence, either substantive or procedural, of the institutions involved in the practice. This article looks at the relationship between the enactments, from a doctrinal/statutory perspective, as well as a constitutional perspective and by way of a focused comparison with the United Kingdom and South Africa. It implies the statutes are a coherent and less than full co-regulatory system. The general clinical, laboratory, gamete and embryo elements of surrogacy are covered by the ART Act, the special elements of gestational, eligibility and parentage are covered by the Surrogacy Act. But the definitions and institutions are mutually incorporated, as are the divergent eligibility requirements, rules of genetic-connection, consent structures, requirements for registration, record retention periods and criminal classifications. The 2023 and 2024 amendments on donor gametes are examples of multiple substantive changes to access of surrogacy being made via delegated legislation. The implications of the transitional uncertainty and consent and lack of traceability of embryos have been further illustrated by the recent decisions of the Supreme Court in Vijaya Kumari S v Union of India (2025 INSC 1209) and Smt Usha Singh v State of Chhattisgarh (19 January 2026). The article suggests an express general – special relationship clause, harmonised definitions, modular single window licensing, integrated consent and audit protocols, data governance, harmonised data and proportional penalties and transitional provisions. In the longer term, it calls for the consolidation through a Reproductive Assistance and Surrogacy Code that safeguards the reproductive autonomy, the welfare of the surrogate and the interests of the child and guarantees clinical integrity. |
| Keywords | Assisted reproductive technology; surrogacy; reproductive autonomy; donor gametes; statutory interpretation; reproductive justice; infertility law; India |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 4, July-August 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-08-05 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals