International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 4
July-August 2026
Indexing Partners
Corporate Haircuts, Creditor Rights and Value Maximisation: A Corporate Law Perspective on Insolvency Resolution in India
| Author(s) | Ms. Vidhya Vijayakumar T, Dr. Jeyalakshmi S |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) was introduced with the objective of consolidating India’s fragmented insolvency framework and establishing a time-bound mechanism for resolving financial distress. At the centre of this framework lies the objective of value maximisation, which seeks to preserve the value of distressed enterprises while ensuring an effective distribution of proceeds among creditors and other stakeholders. One of the most debated consequences of the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) is the substantial “haircut” accepted by creditors on their admitted claims. Although a haircut is not, by itself, evidence of failure, increasingly high haircuts raise important questions concerning creditor rights, valuation practices, commercial wisdom, corporate governance and the effectiveness of the insolvency framework. This article examines corporate haircuts from a corporate law perspective, focusing on the relationship between creditor decision-making and the statutory objective of value maximisation. It analyses the role of the Committee of Creditors (CoC), the scope of its commercial wisdom, judicial approaches to resolution plans, and the consequences of prolonged insolvency proceedings on enterprise value and creditor recovery. The article also considers the unequal position of financial and operational creditors and the need to maintain a balance between creditor autonomy and institutional accountability. Recent data concerning recovery rates, resolution timelines and liquidation outcomes demonstrate that delays and deterioration of distressed assets continue to affect the effectiveness of the IBC. The article argues that the legitimacy of a haircut should be assessed not merely by its percentage but by the circumstances in which it occurs, the quality of valuation, the competitiveness of the resolution process, and whether the resolution plan genuinely promotes value preservation and maximisation. It concludes by proposing greater transparency, stronger valuation safeguards, institutional capacity building and limited but effective judicial oversight without undermining the commercial discretion of creditors. |
| Keywords | Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, Corporate Haircuts, Creditor Rights, Value Maximisation, Committee of Creditors, Corporate Governance, CIRP. |
| Field | Business Administration |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 4, July-August 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-08-18 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals