International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 4
July-August 2026
Indexing Partners
Kin, Care, and the Law: Reforming Georgia's Guardianship Framework to Recognise Black Matriarchal Caregiving Through Legislative and Feminist Reconstruction
| Author(s) | Mr. Shiv Shakti Singh |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | The prevailing legal conception of the family in the United States has long been anchored to the image of the biological nuclear unit, a construct that bears diminishing resemblance to the lived realities of a significant portion of the American population. For centuries, and indeed long before the formal abolition of slavery, African American grandmothers, aunts, and other female matriarchal figures have assumed primary caregiving responsibilities for successive generations of children whose biological parents were unable to fulfil that role. These women have formed the quiet but indispensable foundation of countless African American family units, yet the universalist legal order has historically overlooked their contributions, privileging instead the formal rights of biological parents and the theoretical ideal of the nuclear family above the social realities of kinship care. Whilst legal mechanisms nominally exist through which kinship caregivers might obtain rights comparable to those of a biological parent, including temporary and permanent guardianship, the procedural complexity, adjudicative unpredictability, and practical inaccessibility of these avenues render them unworkable for a great many non-traditional caregiving families. This Note examines Georgia's existing guardianship framework and the manner in which its demanding consent requirements and capricious adjudicative processes operate to restrict kinship caregivers' access to the financial and social resources they urgently need. Two legislative remedies are proposed. The first is the adoption of a statute modelled upon New Jersey's Kinship Guardianship Notification Act, which would ensure that kinship caregivers are made aware of the state support mechanisms available to them. The second is the reintroduction of de facto parenthood legislation, previously advanced before the Georgia legislature as House Bill 321, which would remove the extensive petitioning requirements and procedural obstacles that presently impede recognition of de facto custodians. Beyond these specific proposals, this Note advocates for the integration of Black feminist theory within family law's analytical framework, urging a fundamental reorientation of the legal narrative of family away from the abstract Anglo-American nuclear ideal and toward a conception that is genuinely responsive to the diversity of family formation across all ethnic and social communities. |
| Keywords | Kinship, Guardianship, Matriarchy, Recognition, Pluralism |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 4, July-August 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-08-21 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i04.86215 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals