International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICRTET-4
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
Mathematical Hardness Assumptions in Modern Cryptography: A Comparative Survey from Classical Number Theory to Post‑Quantum Security
| Author(s) | Yash Soni |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Modern cryptography is based on the premise that certain mathematical problems are extremely difficult for computers to solve. This premise - the "hardness assumptions" - underpins secure communication on the internet, in banking, and the authentication of our digital selves. Traditional public-key cryptographic techniques such as RSA and Diffie-Hellman are built on number-theoretic problems such as factoring numbers into primes and discrete logarithms. They are considered to be "hard" for ordinary - "classical" - computers to solve. However, strong quantum algorithms reveal these to be easy problems for a sufficiently powerful large-scale quantum computer, thereby jeopardizing these systems. The secondary study examined principal mathematical hardness assumptions that underpin modern cryptography. We compared classical assumptions with post-quantum ones in post-quantum signature, key establishment, and encryption schemes such as code-based, hash-based, isogeny-based, lattice-based, and multivariate. We studied their theoretical and mathematical bases, security strengths, computational efficiencies, and defenses against quantum attacks, with specific attention devoted to NIST selection (Kyber, Dilithium, Falcon, and SPHINCS+). This analysis found that although classical assumptions are mature and widely used, they were susceptible to quantum attacks, while several of the post-quantum assumptions seem resistant but are not so mature and less well explored. We also discussed challenges that must be addressed when deploying and using the chosen post-quantum systems for infrastructure migration. |
| Keywords | Cryptography, Mathematical Hardness Assumptions, Computational Complexity, RSA, Discrete Logarithm Problem, Lattice‑Based Cryptography, Post‑Quantum Cryptography. |
| Field | Mathematics |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 5, September-October 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-10-04 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals