International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICRTET-4
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 4
July-August 2026
Indexing Partners
Codification Of Parliamentary Privileges In India: Reconciling Legislative Independence With Constitutional Supremacy
| Author(s) | Dr. Manashi Kalita |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Parliamentary privilege in India poses a constitutional challenge. The Constitution protects the independence of Parliament through Articles 105 and 194 while also upholding constitutional supremacy, judicial review, and fundamental rights. Although Article 105(3) allows Parliament to define its powers, privileges, and immunities by law, these privileges remain largely uncodified even after more than seventy years. This article examines whether such uncertainty is consistent with the rule of law in a constitutional democracy. It analyses constitutional provisions and key Supreme Court decisions, including In re: Keshav Singh, P.V. Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE), and Raja Ram Pal v. Speaker, Lok Sabha, to show that parliamentary privileges are not unlimited and must conform to constitutional principles. The study demonstrates that judicial interpretation has increasingly linked parliamentary privilege with fundamental rights, fairness, and the Basic Structure doctrine. However, the lack of codification continues to create legal uncertainty and institutional conflict. Relying on the experience of Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States, the article argues that codifying parliamentary privileges can provide clarity while preserving legislative independence. It recommends substantive, procedural, and hybrid reforms to balance parliamentary autonomy with constitutional accountability and strengthen the rule of law. |
| Keywords | Parliamentary Privilege, Constitutional Supremacy, Judicial Review, Basic Structure Doctrine, Rule of Law. |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 4, July-August 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-08-26 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals