International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160   •   Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 8, Issue 5 (September-October 2026) Submit your research before last 3 days of October to publish your research paper in the issue of September-October.
Submit Research Paper Join as a Reviewer

Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker TurnItIn

Call for Paper

Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026

Submit your research paper

Indexing Partners
Academia Advanced Sciences Index Bielefeld Academic Search Engine CiteSeer DRJI Google Scholar Independent Search Engine & Directory Network ISI (International Scientific Indexing) Issuu Mendeley Research Networks
RefSeek ResearcherId - Thomson Reuters ResearchGate Scirus Scribd Semantic Scholar UTeM - Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Wiki for Call for Papers WorldCat Zenodo

Maternity Benefits And Reproductive Rights Of Working Women In India

Author(s) Mr. Kopna Vijaya Babu
Country India
Abstract Maternity protection lies at the intersection of labour welfare, substantive equality, reproductive autonomy, public health, and the constitutional valuation of care. India’s Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, substantially strengthened by the 2017 amendment, promises twenty-six weeks of paid leave for many employees, protection against dismissal, nursing breaks, crèche access, and limited recognition of adoptive and commissioning motherhood. Yet the promise is institutionally uneven. Employer-financed benefits may discourage the hiring and retention of women; the threshold-based model excludes much informal and precarious work; crèche and work-from-home clauses are weakly specified; enforcement is complaint-driven; and maternity remains framed predominantly as a woman’s private responsibility rather than a social function shared by the State, employers, and all parents. This article evaluates the statutory scheme alongside the Constitution, social-security legislation, international standards, labour-market trends, and the Supreme Court’s equality and reproductive-rights jurisprudence. It gives particular attention to Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Female Workers (Muster Roll ), Deepika Singh v. Central Administrative Tribunal, and the 2026 decision in Hamsaanandini Nanduri v. Union of India. It argues for universal, publicly pooled maternity income security; enforceable childcare standards; inclusive parental and adoption leave; protection for non-standard workers; and data-led labour inspection. Maternity protection should be reconstructed as an equality-enabling social infrastructure, not an employment cost attached to women
Keywords Maternity benefit; reproductive rights; working women; substantive equality; paid maternity leave; care work; crèche; informal employment; pregnancy discrimination; social security; India
Published In Volume 8, Issue 5, September-October 2026
Published On 2026-09-04
DOI https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i05.86892
View / Download PDF File

Share this



E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef

CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr

Downloads
Research Paper Format Copyright Permission Form and Undertaking Form

All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.

CC-BY-SA Open Access

About IJFMR
Fees & Payment
Current Issue
Publication Archive 		Submit Research Paper
Track Submission Status
Publication Guidelines
Publication Ethics
Peer Review & Plagiarism 		Join as a Reviewer
Editors & Reviewers
Reviewer Referral Program
Get Reviewer Membership Certi. 		Website/Journal Policies
Usage Policy
Content Policies
Privacy Policy
Contact Us +91-9687-828-838 editor@ijfmr.com
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals