International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160   •   Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 8, Issue 5 (September-October 2026) Submit your research before last 3 days of October to publish your research paper in the issue of September-October.
Submit Research Paper Join as a Reviewer

Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker TurnItIn

Call for Paper

Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026

Submit your research paper

Indexing Partners
Academia Advanced Sciences Index Bielefeld Academic Search Engine CiteSeer DRJI Google Scholar Independent Search Engine & Directory Network ISI (International Scientific Indexing) Issuu Mendeley Research Networks
RefSeek ResearcherId - Thomson Reuters ResearchGate Scirus Scribd Semantic Scholar UTeM - Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Wiki for Call for Papers WorldCat Zenodo

The Battle of Haldighati (1576): A Critical Review

Author(s) Dr. Bhupendra Singh Rathore
Country India
Abstract The Battle of Haldighati, fought in June 1576 between the forces of Maharana Pratap of Mewar and the Mughal imperial army commanded by Raja Man Singh of Amber, occupies an unusual position in South Asian historical memory. It was a relatively short engagement, yet it became a durable symbol of Rajput resistance, political sovereignty and heroic sacrifice. This review reassesses the battle by separating three questions that are frequently conflated: the immediate tactical result, the operational consequences of the campaign, and the long-term strategic objective of Mughal policy toward Mewar. The article compares the principal contemporary Persian sources—especially Abu'l-Fazl's Akbarnama, 'Abd al-Qadir Bada'uni's Muntakhab al-Tawarikh, and Nizamuddin Ahmad's Tabaqat-i-Akbari—with later Rajasthani historiography, colonial-era writing and modern scholarship. Particular attention is given to source bias, chronology, army estimates, geography, the role of Rajput and Afghan contingents, the Bhils, the withdrawal of Pratap, the occupation of Gogunda, and the subsequent continuation of resistance. The review argues that the most defensible formulation is that Haldighati constituted a Mughal tactical/operational success but not a decisive strategic conquest of Mewar. Pratap's survival and the subsequent recovery of territory demonstrate that battlefield possession did not equal political pacification. At the same time, claims of an unambiguous Mewar battlefield victory cannot be sustained from the strongest contemporary evidence. Haldighati is therefore best understood as one phase of a prolonged contest over sovereignty, rather than as a self-contained war whose meaning can be reduced to a binary victory/defeat label.
Keywords Haldighati, Maharana Pratap, Akbar; Man Singh, Mewar, Mughal Empire, Rajput polity, military history, historiography, Aravallis
Field Sociology > Archaeology / History
Published In Volume 8, Issue 5, September-October 2026
Published On 2026-09-04
View / Download PDF File

Share this



E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef

CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr

Downloads
Research Paper Format Copyright Permission Form and Undertaking Form

All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.

CC-BY-SA Open Access

About IJFMR
Fees & Payment
Current Issue
Publication Archive 		Submit Research Paper
Track Submission Status
Publication Guidelines
Publication Ethics
Peer Review & Plagiarism 		Join as a Reviewer
Editors & Reviewers
Reviewer Referral Program
Get Reviewer Membership Certi. 		Website/Journal Policies
Usage Policy
Content Policies
Privacy Policy
Contact Us +91-9687-828-838 editor@ijfmr.com
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals