International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICRTET-4
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
Comparative Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Cardiovascular Disease Diagnosis and Risk Prediction
| Author(s) | Ms. Marium Shujauddin Shaikh, Dr. Hanmant Sambhaji Fadewar |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of global mortality, necessitating accurate and clinically generalizable diagnostic models. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), has demonstrated potential in analyzing clinical data for early CVD detection. However, existing studies predominantly focus on single-model performance within isolated datasets, with limited cross-comparative synthesis. This study provides a comparative evaluation of major AI algorithms for CVD diagnosis and risk prediction. A narrative review of comparative studies published between 2019 and 2026 was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and SciSpace. Performance metrics were synthesized across models including Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Gradient Boosting, ensemble methods, and Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). Results reveal ensemble and Gradient Boosting approaches consistently demonstrated superior predictive performance (AUC: 0.80–0.92). Random Forest frequently outperformed KNN and logistic regression in structured clinical data. Although deep learning models achieved high accuracy in single-cohort studies, limited external validation constrains clinical applicability. This study provides evidence that ensemble-based frameworks currently offer the most effective balance between predictive accuracy, robustness, and clinical feasibility. Future research should emphasize multi-center external validation and explainable AI frameworks. |
| Keywords | Cardiovascular disease; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Deep learning; Risk prediction |
| Field | Computer Applications |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 5, September-October 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-09-04 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i05.87213 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals