International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160     Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 8, Issue 5 (September-October 2026) Submit your research before last 3 days of October to publish your research paper in the issue of September-October.

Conflict as Contact: Acknowledgement-Seeking as a Candidate Function of Unsolicited Online Provocation

Author(s) Prof. Dr. Stoyana Natseva
Country Mexico
Abstract Digital environments have expanded opportunities for interpersonal communication while leaving loneliness and perceived social disconnection widespread. Within these environments, a substantial share of negative interaction is unsolicited: individuals initiate derogatory or provocative communication with strangers, creators, and public figures with whom they have no prior relationship. Existing accounts explain such behaviour primarily through personality dispositions, entertainment motives, ideological commitment, and status competition, and thereby identify who provokes rather than what maintains the behaviour. This theoretical article proposes an additional and empirically distinguishable functional account, the Conflict-as-Contact Hypothesis (CCH), which holds that some unsolicited online provocation is maintained because it reliably produces interpersonal acknowledgement, and that acknowledgement may reinforce independently of its emotional valence. The article advances a specific falsifiable claim: under conditions of perceived social invisibility, an aversive interpersonal response such as anger, defensiveness, or retaliation may function as an appetitive reinforcer rather than as a punisher. This mechanism is formalised as the Conflict-Attention-Reinforcement Loop and expressed as six testable propositions with specified disconfirming outcomes. The framework is explicitly differentiated from several adjacent accounts, including rejection-induced aggression, compensatory internet use, negative social potency, and visibility enhancement through antagonism. A discriminating test is identified in the neutral acknowledging response, which the dominance interpretation predicts to be non-reinforcing and which CCH predicts to be partially reinforcing. CCH does not claim that trolling is caused by loneliness, nor that online aggression is covertly prosocial; it proposes acknowledgement-seeking as one candidate function among several nonexclusive functions.
Keywords online provocation; trolling; acknowledgement; social reinforcement; online disinhibition; ostracism; compensatory internet use; attention economy
Published In Volume 8, Issue 5, September-October 2026
Published On 2026-09-08
DOI https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i05.87329

Share this