International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICRTET-4
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
The Self-Correcting Budget: Removing an Allocator's Own Footprint from Attribution
| Author(s) | Mr. Sameer Siddiqui |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Automated advertising systems increasingly close the loop between measurement and action: an attribution model estimates channel contribution, and an optimizer reallocates budget toward the apparent contributors. When such a loop operates on raw attribution, it confounds the consequences of its own reallocation with the underlying merit of the channels it evaluates. A channel that harvests pre-existing demand appears more efficient precisely because the system spends into it, producing a self-reinforcing bias toward the least incremental channels. We characterize this failure mode from first principles using event-level data, and evaluate a mechanism that treats each reallocation as a randomized experiment the system performs on itself: a within-channel holdout supplies an incrementality estimate, and the debiased signal—rather than raw attribution—drives the next allocation. In a controlled simulation with known ground truth across forty randomized environments, the debiased loop reduces efficiency-estimation error, avoids the adversarial “trap” channel, and—most importantly—retains a near-constant share of optimal return as confounding strengthens, whereas the raw-signal loop degrades monotonically. We report magnitudes as illustrative of the mechanism rather than as benchmarks from live systems, and delineate the boundary between established incrementality measurement and the novel closure it enables. |
| Keywords | marketing attribution; incrementality; causal inference; budget allocation; closed-loop control; confounding |
| Field | Computer > Artificial Intelligence / Simulation / Virtual Reality |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 5, September-October 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-09-20 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals