International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICRTET-4
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
Climate Induced Displacement and India's legal Vacuum: Rethinking Refugee Protection, Non-Refoulement and Complementary Protection
| Author(s) | Tara Dubey |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Climate change is increasingly transforming patterns of human mobility. Rising sea levels, coastal erosion, floods, cyclones, droughts, extreme heat, desertification and the gradual destruction of livelihoods can make continued residence in a particular territory unsafe or impossible. Although climate-induced displacement is no longer merely an environmental concern, international and domestic legal systems have not developed an equally coherent framework for protecting persons compelled to move because of climate-related conditions. The expression “climate refugee” is widely used in public discourse, yet persons displaced exclusively by climate change do not ordinarily fall within the refugee definition contained in the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees. At the same time, international human rights law has increasingly recognised that returning a person to conditions involving a sufficiently serious and foreseeable risk to life or inhuman treatment may engage non-refoulement obligations. India presents a particularly important legal context. It is highly vulnerable to climate-induced displacement but has neither enacted a comprehensive refugee law nor created a statutory category for persons displaced across borders because of climate-related harm. Nevertheless, constitutional jurisprudence provides potentially significant protection. In M.K. Ranjitsinh v Union of India, the Supreme Court recognised a constitutional right against the adverse effects of climate change under Articles 14 and 21. This paper examines the limitations of the existing refugee regime, the relevance of non-refoulement, the potential of complementary protection and the constitutional basis for a rights-based climate-displacement framework in India. It argues that India should adopt a layered protection mechanism combining refugee law, constitutional safeguards, humanitarian protection, temporary protection, disaster management and planned relocation. Keywords: Climate-induced displacement; climate refugees; refugee law; non-refoulement; complementary protection; Article 21; Article 14; climate change; India; asylum; human rights. |
| Keywords | Human Rights, Refuggees, Non-Refoulement |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 5, September-October 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-09-14 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals