Cross-Domain Evidence Synthesis for the Design of a Mini Adventure Bike for Children Aged 7–12: Bridging Child Development, Safety, and Adventure-Cycling Research

Lakshay Manot; Aastha Deshpande

doi:10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i05.87670

Cross-Domain Evidence Synthesis for the Design of a Mini Adventure Bike for Children Aged 7–12: Bridging Child Development, Safety, and Adventure-Cycling Research

Author(s)	Mr. Lakshay Manot, Prof. Aastha Deshpande
Country	India
Abstract	Background: Children aged 7 to 12 are in a stage of development where motor and perceptual skills needed for cycling are still developing, while there is a growing commercial and recreational interest in adventure and electric-assisted cycling. No existing research directly looks at a mini adventure bike designed for this age group, which means there is a need for cross-domain synthesis. Aim: This report combines evidence from 15 studies covering child motor development, cycling safety, physical activity, consumer behaviour, and adult adventure or e-bike research to create clear design requirements for a mini adventure bike. Method: A secondary qualitative and thematic analysis was conducted on a pre-compiled evidence matrix of 15 studies, extracting and comparing findings, conclusions, and future research recommendations across nine thematic areas. Main findings: Children under 12 do not fully automate the perceptual-motor skills needed for safe cycling (Zeuwts et al., 2020), and adults supervising child riders often adjust their behaviour significantly in response to perceived child risk (Hatfield et al., 2019).Terrain variety and technical features are strongly linked to positive cycling experience in recreational settings (Hagen et al., 2016), and electric assistance increases access to challenging terrain for adults (Van Vuren, 2022), though these have not been tested with children. Design implications: A clearly supported design must prioritize stability, controlled handling, visibility suitable for supervision, gradually increasing terrain difficulty, and motivation elements appropriate for child development. All dimensions and load specifications require direct testing with children. Conclusion: The existing evidence supports carefully developmentally based design principles rather than directly applying adult adventure-cycling or e-bike trends to child products; further empirical testing with children is essential before finalizing any prototype.
Keywords	Keywords: Mini Adventure Bike, Child Cycling Development, E-Bike Design, Child Safety, Thematic Evidence Synthesis.
Published In	Volume 8, Issue 5, September-October 2026
Published On	2026-09-13
DOI	https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i05.87670

View / Download PDF File

About IJFMR Fees & Payment Current Issue Publication Archive	Submit Research Paper Track Submission Status Publication Guidelines Publication Ethics Peer Review & Plagiarism	Join as a Reviewer Editors & Reviewers Reviewer Referral Program Get Reviewer Membership Certi.	Website/Journal Policies Usage Policy Content Policies Privacy Policy

Contact Us		+91-9687-828-838	editor@ijfmr.com

International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Cross-Domain Evidence Synthesis for the Design of a Mini Adventure Bike for Children Aged 7–12: Bridging Child Development, Safety, and Adventure-Cycling Research

Share this