International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICRTET-4
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
A Discipline in Flux: Four Redefinitions of the Subject in the Sociology of Gender in India, 1974–2024
| Author(s) | Ms. Mansi Sisodia |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Flux is not a recent condition of gender scholarship in India; it is the condition under which the field was founded. This paper reconstructs the emergence and growth of the sociology of gender in India and argues that its history is best read as a sequence of redefinitions of its own subject, each provoked less by theoretical fashion than by evidence the existing categories could not hold. The first redefinition was empirical. The 1974 report Towards Equality, with its finding of a declining sex ratio and worsening indicators for women, made gender a documented problem for Indian social science before it became a theoretical one, and exposed the silences of village studies, kinship theory and stratification analysis. The second was institutional: the National Policy on Education of 1986 and the university women’s studies centres that followed converted movement urgency into syllabi, journals and posts, securing the field while binding it to state funding. The third was intersectional, and it was not borrowed. Dalit feminist scholarship, drawing on a Phule–Ambedkarite lineage, contested the unmarked upper-caste subject of earlier writing, while vernacular and regional research unsettled the metropolitan bias of the archive. India’s route to intersectional analysis ran through caste, and this paper treats that route as a contribution to the concept rather than a local application of it. A fourth redefinition is under way and remains unsettled. Scholarship on masculinities, on queer and transgender lives after the judicial shifts of 2014 and 2018, on care work, digital publics and climate-related displacement has widened the field precisely as restructuring under the National Education Policy 2020 absorbs autonomous centres into larger units. Drawing on curricula, doctoral output and journal debates, the paper asks what a discipline gains, and what it forfeits, when expansion and consolidation arrive together. |
| Keywords | Sociology of gender · Caste and gender · Intersectionality · Institutionalisation · Indian academy |
| Field | Sociology |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 5, September-October 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-09-19 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals