International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160   •   Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 8, Issue 5 (September-October 2026) Submit your research before last 3 days of October to publish your research paper in the issue of September-October.
Submit Research Paper Join as a Reviewer

Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker TurnItIn

Call for Paper

Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026

Submit your research paper

Indexing Partners
Academia Advanced Sciences Index Bielefeld Academic Search Engine CiteSeer DRJI Google Scholar Independent Search Engine & Directory Network ISI (International Scientific Indexing) Issuu Mendeley Research Networks
RefSeek ResearcherId - Thomson Reuters ResearchGate Scirus Scribd Semantic Scholar UTeM - Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Wiki for Call for Papers WorldCat Zenodo

What the Anti-Reservation Narrative Doesn't Tell You

Author(s) Mr. Subhransu Satyabrata Jena
Country India
Abstract India's 2026 anti-reservation wave, fronted by groups like the Reservation Hatao Andolan and amplified by viral claims that students with "30-40% marks" are securing medical seats and public jobs, rests heavily on a statistic that conflates NEET's qualifying cutoff with its far higher admission cutoff. This article traces that claim against the fuller record: the constitutional basis for reservation under Articles 15 and 16; the legal architecture built through Indra Sawhney (1992), the 103rd Amendment and EWS quota (2019, upheld in Janhit Abhiyan, 2022), and the Davinder Singh sub-classification ruling (2024); the historical arc from the 1990 Mandal protests and Rajiv Goswami's self-immolation through the 2006 agitations to 2026's Cockroach Janta Party protests and NEET paper-leak fallout; the paradox of dominant-caste agitations (Patidar, Maratha, Jat) demanding entry into quotas rather than their abolition; overlooked factors like management-quota seats and the still-unimplemented Rohini Commission findings on OBC benefit concentration; and judiciary representation data cited by reservation's defenders. It closes by giving equal weight to the anti-reservation movement's legitimate grievances the creamy-layer gap, genuine individual hardship, and an unexamined private sector before offering practical suggestions for students, media, and policymakers navigating an unresolved, decades-old debate.
Keywords reservation in India; anti-reservation movement; caste-based reservation; NEET cutoff; qualifying cutoff vs. admission cutoff; EWS quota; creamy layer; Indra Sawhney judgment; Mandal Commission; Reservation Hatao Andolan; sub-classification; Rohini Commission; affirmative action; social justice; Indian Constitution Article 15 and 16; OBC reservation; SC ST reservation; merit debate; misinformation; Cockroach Janta Party.
Published In Volume 8, Issue 5, September-October 2026
Published On 2026-09-20
DOI https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i05.88028
View / Download PDF File

Share this



E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef

CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr

Downloads
Research Paper Format Copyright Permission Form and Undertaking Form

All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.

CC-BY-SA Open Access

About IJFMR
Fees & Payment
Current Issue
Publication Archive 		Submit Research Paper
Track Submission Status
Publication Guidelines
Publication Ethics
Peer Review & Plagiarism 		Join as a Reviewer
Editors & Reviewers
Reviewer Referral Program
Get Reviewer Membership Certi. 		Website/Journal Policies
Usage Policy
Content Policies
Privacy Policy
Contact Us +91-9687-828-838 editor@ijfmr.com
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals