International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160   •   Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 8, Issue 5 (September-October 2026) Submit your research before last 3 days of October to publish your research paper in the issue of September-October.
Submit Research Paper Join as a Reviewer

Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker TurnItIn

Call for Paper

Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026

Submit your research paper

Indexing Partners
Academia Advanced Sciences Index Bielefeld Academic Search Engine CiteSeer DRJI Google Scholar Independent Search Engine & Directory Network ISI (International Scientific Indexing) Issuu Mendeley Research Networks
RefSeek ResearcherId - Thomson Reuters ResearchGate Scirus Scribd Semantic Scholar UTeM - Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Wiki for Call for Papers WorldCat Zenodo

The Phoenix and the Paradox: Rwanda, Malawi, and the Politics of Development

Author(s) Masaro Uwanziza
Country Rwanda
Abstract Why have Rwanda and Malawi, two African countries facing many similar structural constraints, experienced different development trajectories? This question is interesting because Rwanda entered the post-1994 period following an extraordinary episode of political violence and institutional destruction, while Malawi transitioned to multiparty rule without a comparable rupture. Yet over the following decades, Rwanda generally progressed faster across several measures of economic and social development. This paper examines the divergence through the relationship between critical junctures, political settlements, and state capacity. It argues that structural conditions alone cannot adequately explain the different trajectories. Rather, the political and institutional orders that emerged from the countries’ respective transitions shaped the incentives governing state-building and policy implementation. In Rwanda, the post-genocide ruling coalition pursued a concentrated project of state reconstruction in which administrative effectiveness and development became closely linked to the consolidation of the new political order. In Malawi, the transition to multiparty politics produced a more competitive and fragmented settlement in which political accommodation and electoral survival often competed with longer-term developmental coordination. These differences did not mechanically determine development outcomes, nor does the paper treat Rwanda’s political settlement as inherently developmental or its performance as unambiguously successful. Instead, the comparison shows how political settlements shape the incentives and institutional capacities through which states respond to common structural constraints. The analysis therefore shifts attention from whether Rwanda or Malawi possessed better initial conditions to how different political orders produced different capacities to pursue development.
Keywords African development, political settlements, state capacity, critical junctures
Published In Volume 8, Issue 5, September-October 2026
Published On 2026-09-26
DOI https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i05.88350
View / Download PDF File

Share this



E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef

CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr

Downloads
Research Paper Format Copyright Permission Form and Undertaking Form

All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.

CC-BY-SA Open Access

About IJFMR
Fees & Payment
Current Issue
Publication Archive 		Submit Research Paper
Track Submission Status
Publication Guidelines
Publication Ethics
Peer Review & Plagiarism 		Join as a Reviewer
Editors & Reviewers
Reviewer Referral Program
Get Reviewer Membership Certi. 		Website/Journal Policies
Usage Policy
Content Policies
Privacy Policy
Contact Us +91-9687-828-838 editor@ijfmr.com
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals