International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICRTET-4
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
Heavy Metals in Skin-Lightening Cosmetics in India: Regulatory Standards, Unauthorized Imports, E-Commerce Non-Compliance, and Post-Market Surveillance
| Author(s) | Ms. Hanna Asaraf, Ms. Fairoosa Thaikkat, Afra P |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Abstract Objective: To explain why skin-lightening cosmetics containing toxic metals continue to reach Indian consumers despite legal controls, and to propose a practicable, risk-based surveillance model. Significance of review: India combines a socially driven market for complexion-altering products with decentralized manufacture, small-parcel trade, and changing online listings. Existing reviews rarely follow products from manufacture or import through enforcement and recall. Key findings: The Cosmetics Rules, 2020 prohibit intentional lead and arsenic colorants, limit unintentional mercury in finished non-eye cosmetics to 1 ppm, require import registration, prescribe labeling and sampling procedures, and provide for voluntary recall. Nevertheless, Indian studies and clinical reports identify mercury in marketed products and mercury-associated nephropathy. Persistence is best explained by a control-system mismatch: registration is disconnected from online listing verification; small parcels and third-country routing can bypass import controls; seller identities are mutable; surveillance is episodic; regulatory data are fragmented between central, state, customs, consumer, and platform systems; and adverse-event and recall arrangements do not create a visible feedback loop. Results require interpretation because deliberate mercury adulteration differs from unavoidable trace contamination by lead, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, or nickel. Conclusions: India should establish a searchable product and responsible-person register, require platforms to verify registration before listing imported cosmetics, apply risk-scored online and border sampling, use validated X-ray fluorescence screening followed by confirmatory ICP-MS or equivalent methods, mandate serious cosmetic adverse-event reporting and recall effectiveness checks, and publish interoperable alerts in real time. Enforcement should prioritize products with absent provenance, skin-lightening claims, rapid relisting, or prior international alerts. |
| Keywords | skin lightening; mercury; lead; arsenic; cadmium; cosmetics regulation; CDSCO; e-commerce; post-market surveillance; India |
| Field | Medical / Pharmacy |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 5, September-October 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-09-27 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals