Vācāguti: Restraint in Speech as the Root of Dhamma in the Edicts of Aśoka

Adv. Rajiv Ambadas Shinde

doi:10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i05.88575

Vācāguti: Restraint in Speech as the Root of Dhamma in the Edicts of Aśoka

Author(s)	Mr. Adv. Rajiv Ambadas Shinde
Country	India
Abstract	This paper examines the single principle in Aśoka's inscriptions that most closely approximates a doctrine of expression: restraint in speech (vācāguti). Major Rock Edict XII, the locus classicus for the doctrine, identifies restraint in speech as the root of growth in the essentials of all sects, and specifies it as the compound abstention from praising one's own sect and condemning the sect of others without good cause; where cause exists, criticism is licensed only if done in a mild way (Tola & Dragonetti, 2005). The paper argues that Aśoka's contribution is not a doctrine of free speech but a doctrine of disciplined speech: expression is to be guided by self-restraint (samyama) and by a deliberate management of words, and the sanction for failure is internal — the speaker harms his own sect rather than incurring a penalty from the state (Yahya et al., 2022). A central terminological argument runs through the paper. The parent doctrine is sammā vācā, rendered "right speech" in the translation tradition (Sharda, 2019; Vivek, 2024); but this paper follows the philological sense of sammā as equilibrium rather than as a juridical verdict of right opposed to wrong, and reads the doctrine as a discipline maintaining a state of balance in speech — an experiential condition rather than a rule-compliance. On that reading, vācāguti and samyama describe the same work: the maintenance of equilibrium, one in the domain of speech, the other in the domain of self-possession. The paper reconstructs the principle as a system of self-related and other-related self-restraint with the "control of tongue" as the condition of principled coexistence (Bhargava, 2015), analyses it as a civic virtue that is collectively produced rather than individually held (Bhargava, 2022), considers the scholarly challenge that dhamma was instrumental statecraft rather than conviction (Jayswal, 2025; Kumar, 2024), and concludes that Aśoka constructed the earliest documented royal program in which the restraint of public speakers is treated as the enabling condition of a plural public among the sects and the Pali language is nothing but actually living words not merely words in the language.
Keywords	King Ashoka, vācāguti, sammā, equilibrium of speech, Sect, religion, free expression, Pali, Philology
Field	Sociology > Archaeology / History
Published In	Volume 8, Issue 5, September-October 2026
Published On	2026-09-27
DOI	https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i05.88575

View / Download PDF File

About IJFMR Fees & Payment Current Issue Publication Archive	Submit Research Paper Track Submission Status Publication Guidelines Publication Ethics Peer Review & Plagiarism	Join as a Reviewer Editors & Reviewers Reviewer Referral Program Get Reviewer Membership Certi.	Website/Journal Policies Usage Policy Content Policies Privacy Policy

Contact Us		+91-9687-828-838	editor@ijfmr.com

International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Vācāguti: Restraint in Speech as the Root of Dhamma in the Edicts of Aśoka

Share this