International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICRTET-4
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
Mechanical properties of CAD/CAM frameworks vs. conventional methods (Systematic review)
| Author(s) | Dr. Deo Gracias Hounyetin, Dr. Oussama Boukdir, Dr. Mory Keita, Dr. Alpha Amadou Barry, Prof. Asmaa Hatim, K. Elboussir |
|---|---|
| Country | Morocco |
| Abstract | Background: The use of cobalt-based alloys, particularly cobalt-chromium, for fabricating metal frameworks in removable partial dentures became widespread from 1930 onward owing to their mechanical and chemical properties. Other materials such as titanium and its alloys, as well as PEEK/PEKK, are also used to fabricate removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks. Their manufacture follows different processes. The aim of this systematic review is to compare the mechanical properties of frameworks produced by conventional methods with those produced by CAD/CAM techniques (SLM, DMLS, DMLM). Materials and methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guidelines. It included prospective and retrospective studies, randomized controlled trials, and in vitro studies. The review focused on the mechanical properties of removable partial denture frameworks fabricated by conventional methods or by CAD/CAM. Only studies published between 2015 and 2025 were searched. Results: The 13 studies selected and analyzed revealed that CAD/CAM produces frameworks with a more homogeneous microstructure and higher hardness (502.86 HV for SLM versus 416.53 HV for casting). However, CAD/CAM-fabricated frameworks may show greater surface roughness and require polishing to achieve a satisfactory clinical fit. Conclusion: Overall, CAD/CAM appears to offer superior mechanical performance. However, conventional techniques retain an important role in clinical practice. Finally, since all analyzed studies were conducted in vitro, it is useful to supplement these data with longitudinal clinical studies under real intraoral conditions. |
| Keywords | Removable partial denture – Framework materials – Mechanical properties – Conventional methods – CAD/CAM |
| Field | Medical / Pharmacy |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 5, September-October 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-10-03 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i05.88851 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals