International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
ISC-AISGF-TBRF
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICRTET-4
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
From Basic Independence To Inclusive Participation: Using Adapted Katz Adl And Lawton–Brody Iadl To Diagnose Disability Policy Implementation In Rural Indonesia
| Author(s) | Mr. Muhammad Syahrul Fuady, Prof. Sjamsiar Sjamsuddin, Dr. Mardiyono Mardiyono, Prof. Sujarwoto Sujarwoto |
|---|---|
| Country | Indonesia |
| Abstract | This study examines whether functional independence among persons with disabilities can be used as micro-level evidence for analysing disability policy implementation in rural Indonesia. Drawing on a case context in Karangpatihan Village, Ponorogo Regency, the study integrates adapted Katz Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Lawton–Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) measures with a public policy implementation perspective. The dataset contains 226 complete observations. Because the original instruments were operationalised using three ordered response categories (1–3), the study treats them as adapted measures rather than standard clinical versions. Descriptive analysis shows a clear distinction between basic and instrumental functioning. The adapted Katz ADL mean was 16.67/18, with 87.6% of respondents in the 16–18 descriptive range, whereas the IADL mean was 12.62/18, with 55.8% scoring 13 or above. In the IADL domains, financial management (2.65/3) and medication management (2.58/3) were strongest, while mobile-phone use (1.41/3) and public transportation (1.54/3) were weakest. Robust ordinal psychometric analysis further showed high ordinal internal consistency (IADL αordinal = 0.934, ω = 0.949; Katz αordinal = 0.962, ω = 0.971) and predominantly unidimensional factor structures. However, Katz ADL exhibited a substantial ceiling effect (63.7% at the maximum total score), limiting discrimination among respondents with high basic functioning. The findings suggest that disability inclusion should be assessed not only through individual functioning but also through the accessibility of digital, transportation, market, and public-service environments. The study contributes a policy-oriented framework in which ADL/IADL measures serve as outcome evidence for diagnosing the gap between formal disability rights and actual opportunities for participation. |
| Keywords | persons with disabilities; rural governance; policy implementation; Katz ADL; Lawton–Brody IADL; accessibility; capability approach; Indonesia |
| Field | Sociology > Administration / Law / Management |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 5, September-October 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-10-21 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i05.88913 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals