International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
ISC-AISGF-TBRF
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICRTET-4
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
Effectiveness of Whistleblower Mechanisms in Preventing Corporate Fraud: A Critical Study under the Companies Act, 2013, with Special Reference to Indian Companies
| Author(s) | Ms. Aisha Rafiq |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | This paper is a thorough critical legal analysis of the statute whistleblower regimes under the corporate law regime in India, examining the effectiveness of the Vigil Mechanism put in place under Section 177 of the Companies Act 2013 in combination with the regulatory provisions of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). Whistle-blowing is an important internal control mechanism and a corporate governance tool designed for the detection, deterrent and disclosure of corporate financial fraud, operational malpractices and siphoning of funds, and violation of fiduciary duty. The legal framework on corporate whistleblowing in India, however, shows systemic structural deficiencies, notably the absence of effective anti-retaliation remedies in statute, lax enforcement procedures, no independent outside reporting avenues, and conflicts of interest in management hierarchies within the company. This paper critiques the internal vigilance mechanisms that are often incapable of preventing corporate fraud on a large scale scale, analysing why this is the case by examining statutory provisions, comparative international models (such as Sarbanes-Oxley Act USA, the Dodd-Frank Act USA and the Public Interest Disclosure Act UK) and significant corporate governance failures in India. The analysis shows that statutory obligations have given rise to formal compliance mechanisms, but there is no substantive protection in law, such as statutory monetary bounties, broad anti-retaliation causes of action before dedicated tribunals or enforceable confidentiality assurances for private sector employees. This study thus proposes that the Indian legal system should move from a self-regulatory, adherence to procedure to a more independent, incentivised and well-progressed statutory regime to ensure substantive accountability of the companies and protection of public funds. |
| Keywords | Whistleblower, Vigil Mechanism , Fiduciary duty, Statutory obligations and Confidentiality assurances |
| Field | Sociology > Administration / Law / Management |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 5, September-October 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-10-08 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals