International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160   •   Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 8, Issue 5 (September-October 2026) Submit your research before last 3 days of October to publish your research paper in the issue of September-October.

Effectiveness of Whistleblower Mechanisms in Preventing Corporate Fraud: A Critical Study under the Companies Act, 2013, with Special Reference to Indian Companies

Author(s) Ms. Aisha Rafiq
Country India
Abstract This paper is a thorough critical legal analysis of the statute whistleblower regimes under the corporate law regime in India, examining the effectiveness of the Vigil Mechanism put in place under Section 177 of the Companies Act 2013 in combination with the regulatory provisions of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). Whistle-blowing is an important internal control mechanism and a corporate governance tool designed for the detection, deterrent and disclosure of corporate financial fraud, operational malpractices and siphoning of funds, and violation of fiduciary duty. The legal framework on corporate whistleblowing in India, however, shows systemic structural deficiencies, notably the absence of effective anti-retaliation remedies in statute, lax enforcement procedures, no independent outside reporting avenues, and conflicts of interest in management hierarchies within the company. This paper critiques the internal vigilance mechanisms that are often incapable of preventing corporate fraud on a large scale scale, analysing why this is the case by examining statutory provisions, comparative international models (such as Sarbanes-Oxley Act USA, the Dodd-Frank Act USA and the Public Interest Disclosure Act UK) and significant corporate governance failures in India. The analysis shows that statutory obligations have given rise to formal compliance mechanisms, but there is no substantive protection in law, such as statutory monetary bounties, broad anti-retaliation causes of action before dedicated tribunals or enforceable confidentiality assurances for private sector employees. This study thus proposes that the Indian legal system should move from a self-regulatory, adherence to procedure to a more independent, incentivised and well-progressed statutory regime to ensure substantive accountability of the companies and protection of public funds.
Keywords Whistleblower, Vigil Mechanism , Fiduciary duty, Statutory obligations and Confidentiality assurances
Field Sociology > Administration / Law / Management
Published In Volume 8, Issue 5, September-October 2026
Published On 2026-10-08

Share this