International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICRTET-4
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
Predictive Analytics for Software Reliability: Integrating Software Metrics with Automated Model Search for Quality Assurance Optimization
| Author(s) | Mr. Rashid Anwar Syed, Dr. Arvind Kumar Pandey |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Predicting software reliability is important but difficult: traditional statistical models and manually tuned ML approaches fail to express nonlinearities present in modern software and often demand extensive human domain knowledge. We evaluate an end-to-end automated hyperparameter search pipeline of RF, GB, and SVM classifiers soft-voted together on 21 static code metrics using the NASA KC1 dataset of defect proneness (1162 modules, 25.3% defective) compared with standalone SVM, RF, and ANN baselines under 10-fold stratified cross-validation. SMOTE oversampling is used in each training fold to account for the class-imbalanced data, as explored by recording low recall on a preliminary run with unbalanced training data. Training with balanced data, the automated ensemble meta-model outperforms the other three in terms of F1-score (0.482) and RMSE (0.411), and ties RF for largest AUC (0.722), a slight but consistent improvement upon manually tuned baselines. Halstead complexity and volume metrics, along with overall lines of code are the best predictors of defect proneness. Automated model selection appears to offer a tangible benefit in software reliability prediction, but is only a marginal improvement rather than a silver bullet. Additionally, handling class imbalance is at least as important to generating useful, balanced predictions. |
| Keywords | Software Reliability, Defect Prediction, Automated Machine Learning, Software Metrics, Class Imbalance, SMOTE |
| Field | Computer Applications |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 5, September-October 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-10-03 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i05.88953 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals