International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICRTET-4
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
GeoSecure-FR: A Geofenced, Occlusion-Aware Face Recognition Framework for Proximity-Based Attendance and Access Verification
| Author(s) | Mr. Pradeep Kumar, Prof. Indumathy M |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Attendance systems that match a face against a gallery answer the wrong question. They ask whether an image resembles an enrolled person, not whether a live, visible, enrolled person is at the venue. This paper presents GeoSecure-FR as a rejection cascade for that problem. A phone sends its GPS fix. The method arms the camera only when the Haversine distance to the venue centre is inside a configured radius plus a GPS slack. A captured frame must then clear a visibility check. The serving liveness gate samples a short frame window. While a recapture remains, a missing blink stops the attempt before recognition. The liveness flag is the disjunction of a detected blink and a MobileNetV2 score of at least 0.80, and only the last window is accepted or rejected by that flag. The first failure stops the chain, and the log stores the failing stage. On the AT&T face set, the rank-1 result for the matcher alone is 1.000 for ArcFace against 0.865 for an Eigenfaces baseline under the same protocol. That comparison does not pass the frame through the geofence, the visibility gate, or liveness. A lower-face blackout rule, added after three weaker rules failed, rejects 200 of 200 synthetically masked probes and none of 400 clean frames. Retraining the liveness model on a CelebA-Spoof subset moves two screen-replay scores from 0.986 and 0.968, both false accepts, to 0.035 and 0.121 at a live threshold of 0.80. CPU end-to-end latency remains about 4–7 s, above a 3 s target. These figures show the sample and the condition behind each number. They do not show a presentation-attack rate, a real-mask rate, room-level location, or a latency below 3 s. |
| Keywords | Face Recognition, Geofencing, Occlusion, Liveness Detection, Attendance, Access Control |
| Field | Computer |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 5, September-October 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-10-03 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i05.88962 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals