International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
ISC-AISGF-TBRF
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICRTET-4
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
Electronic Evidence And Criminal Justice In India: An Empirical Study Of Judicial And Investigative Challenges Under The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023
| Author(s) | Ms. Chanchal Meena, Dr. Pooja Jain |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Electronic records including emails, messages, social media postings, papers, CCTV video, and gadget data are used in criminal proceedings. Rapid digital technological development has revolutionised evidence presentation. As digital evidence becomes more important in trials, the Indian government approved the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA), which replaced the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Under Section 61, digital and electronic recordings are main evidence, replacing Section 65B, which was often condemned for its uneven judicial interpretation and technical conservatism. This mixed method research examines how the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 has changed criminal digital evidence processing and admissibility. For example, Section 63 requires electronic records to be accompanied by an authenticity certificate signed by both the device's owner and an expert to ensure chain of custody. The doctrinal part also covers digital signatures, secondary evidence, evidentiary presumptions, and electronic records. In using the new legal framework, advocates, court officials, police detectives, forensic professionals, and law professors provide feedback. The study examines procedural compliance, legal issues in gathering and storing digital evidence, law enforcement's technological capabilities, and the Act's ambiguity on expert qualifications for evidence authenticity, chain of custody, cyber manipulation, and certification. Despite BSA's significant legal enhancement to electronic evidence, digital forensics infrastructure, training, data quality, procedural uniformity, and court capacity still limit its application. Research concluded that the new framework can only be implemented effectively if the criminal justice system as a whole undergoes legislative reform, institutional preparation, technological development, and continual capacity building. |
| Keywords | Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023, Electronic Evidence, digital forensics, admissibility, judiciary Judicial Interpretation, Legal Reform. |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 5, September-October 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-10-10 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i05.89217 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals