International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICRTET-4
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
Regulatory Divergence in Digital Healthcare: Corporate Governance, Risk Mitigation, and Data Privacy Liabilities for Transnational Telehealth Providers Under the EU GDPR and India's DPDPA
| Author(s) | Faisal Yaseen, Fouzan Shah |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Telehealth companies that operate across borders handle sensitive patient data clinical records, biometric information, and behaviour patterns for patients in both the European Union and India. These two regions have very different data protection laws, in terms of how the rules are designed, how they are enforced, and who can be held responsible when something goes wrong. This paper compares the corporate governance duties, risk-management practices, and data privacy liabilities faced by telehealth companies that must follow both the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (DPDPA), which is now being put into effect through the Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025. The study uses GDPR enforcement records, market data on India's telehealth sector, and a survey of 42 compliance officers at telehealth companies. From this, it builds a simple index comparing how strict each law is, and measures how much compliance risk officers feel across six areas of their work. The findings show that GDPR carries a much higher risk of direct fines and has more experienced regulators enforcing it. DPDPA's biggest risk, by contrast, comes from unclear rules particularly around moving data across borders, reporting data breaches on time, and deciding which companies count as “Significant Data Fiduciaries” (a special category under Indian law). The paper argues that companies whose governance structures are built only around GDPR may still have compliance gaps under DPDPA, which focuses heavily on consent and holds company boards directly accountable. It ends by proposing a three-tier governance framework to help companies meet both sets of rules at once. |
| Keywords | telehealth governance; GDPR compliance; Digital Personal Data Protection Act; cross-border data transfer; healthcare data privacy; regulatory divergence |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 5, September-October 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-10-06 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals