International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
ISC-AISGF-TBRF
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICRTET-4
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
Intention, Knowledge, and Moral Responsibility in Theravāda Buddhist Ethics: A Philosophical Analysis of the Pāli Vinaya
| Author(s) | Mr. Yen Sokne |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | This article examines how intention, knowledge, perception, ignorance, mistake, and evidential judgment contribute to the attribution of moral and disciplinary responsibility in the Theravāda Pāli Vinaya. Rather than treating monastic discipline as a mechanical code in which an external act automatically produces a fixed result, the study argues that many Vinaya judgments depend upon a structured relation among a rule, relevant facts, mental conditions, exceptions, and valid communal procedure. The analysis is qualitative and philosophical, using selected Bhikkhu Pātimokkha rules, their Suttavibhaṅga explanations, and related procedural materials as primary evidence. It distinguishes technical Vinaya offence from broader moral evaluation and therefore avoids assuming that intention has the same function in every rule. The article develops a five-part model of disciplinary judgment: normative rule, established facts, relevant cognitive and intentional conditions, applicable exceptions, and disciplinary conclusion. It further shows that confession, testimony, investigation, and communal acts extend responsibility beyond private conscience into shared practices of truthful reporting and procedurally accountable judgment. The central conclusion is that the Pali Vinaya contains a sophisticated practical account of responsible agency in which action is assessed through both conduct and the epistemic conditions relevant to a particular rule. This approach contributes to Buddhist ethics by clarifying the relation between moral agency, knowledge, and institutional responsibility without reducing the Vinaya to a modern legal system. |
| Keywords | Theravada Buddhism, Vinaya Piṭaka, Cetanā, Moral Responsibility, Knowledge, Perception, Buddhist Ethics |
| Field | Sociology > Philosophy / Psychology / Religion |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 5, September-October 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-10-08 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals