International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
ISC-AISGF-TBRF
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICRTET-4
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
Trial of Warrant-cases Instituted on a Police Report Under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: a Critical Analysis
| Author(s) | Ms. SHRI REKHA RAMANATHAN |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (“BNSS”) superseded the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (“CrPC”) as of July 1, 2024, establishing a reorganised framework for criminal procedure in India. Key provisions include Sections 261–266, which outlines the trial process for warrant-cases instituted based on police reports before a Magistrate. These sections detail compliance with disclosure obligations, discharge processes, charge framing, plea of guilty, prosecution evidence and defence evidence. While the BNSS preserves many procedural elements from the CrPC, it introduces specific time constraints and enhances the role of technology in criminal proceedings. This article provides a critical analysis of warrant-cases trials instituted through police reports, focusing primarily on discharge processes and charge framing. It assesses the ongoing significance of established jurisprudence under Sections 239 and 240 of the CrPC while evaluating contemporary scholarship that questions whether these new statutes signify transformative reform or merely procedural adjustments. Moreover, it explores how statutory deadlines relate to speedy justice and the constitutional guarantee of fair procedure under Article 21. Recent judicial rulings, particularly Dr. Anand Rai v. State of Madhya Pradesh, (2026 INSC 141), reaffirm that courts should refrain from conducting mini-trial during charge framing stages. The article contends that the BNSS signifies a continuation with carefully calibrated procedural reforms rather than a complete doctrinal shift. Its efficacy will ultimately be determined by how well it balances expediency with judicial oversight, meaningful defence participation and constitutional safeguard of personal liberty. |
| Keywords | BNSS, warrant-case, police report, discharge, framing of charge, criminal trial, speedy justice, fair trial, Article 21. |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 5, September-October 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-10-11 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i05.89493 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals