International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
ISC-AISGF-TBRF
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICRTET-4
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Reducing Hallucinations in Large Language Models
| Author(s) | Ms. Ruthwi Bohra, Ms. Tejashri Krishnakumar, Sivakumar V |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently generate responses that lack experimental support or are factually mistaken, particularly when addressing domain-specific or unindexed queries. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) diminishes this vulnerability by fetching relevant passages from an external compilation and conditioning generation on the retrieved evidence. This experimental investigation evaluates whether RAG enhances generation accuracy and suppresses hallucinations relative to an unaugmented baseline LLM. We tested both systems across 50 benchmark queries (25 answerable, 25 unanswerable) extracted from the SQuAD 2.0 dataset. While the baseline LLM relied strictly on internal parameters, the RAG architecture indexed external contexts via all-MiniLM-L6-v2 embeddings and FAISS nearest-neighbour search before answer generation with Gemini 1.5 Flash. Comparative evaluation employed Exact Match, token F1 Score, Semantic Similarity, and Hallucination Rate, with RAG additionally appraised for Faithfulness and Retrieval Relevance. Experimental outcomes indicate that RAG increased F1 Score from 3.34% to 33.16% and Semantic Similarity from 38.19% to 57.46%, while Exact Match rose from 0.00% to 8.00%. More importantly, RAG reduced the hallucination rate on unanswerable queries from 100.00% down to 36.00%. Average Faithfulness and Retrieval Relevance scores reached 48.34% and 53.00%, respectively, highlighting that retrieval accuracy remains the primary constraint in grounded synthesis. |
| Keywords | Retrieval-Augmented Generation, Large Language Models, Hallucination Reduction, Natural Language Processing, Question Answering. |
| Field | Computer > Artificial Intelligence / Simulation / Virtual Reality |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 5, September-October 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-10-16 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals