International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
ISC-AISGF-TBRF
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICRTET-4
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
How Is Artificial Intelligence Reshaping Visual Trust? A Review of Photography, Image Manipulation, and the Crisis of Authenticity in Digital Media
| Author(s) | Ms. Myrah Dabboo Ratnani |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Photography has always been privileged in its position as evidence, being regarded as the image that "must have been there" because the image itself is a record of a physical meeting between a scene and a surface. However, that relationship becomes more complicated when it comes to artificial intelligence. Today, generative systems can also create photorealistic images, without relying on a photographed referent, and the more and more widely available editing tools can manipulate authentic images at a level of semantics. This review explores the implications of that change on visual trust. It takes as its theoretical moorings three vital concepts: Barthes's idea of photographic indexicality, the recorded history of photographic manipulation, and Chesney and Citron's idea of the liar's dividend. The following foundations are challenged with the latest evidence of human detection, machine detection and provenance technologies. Human performance becomes less reliable and less consistent: Nightingale and Farid found that for images, participants were only 48.2% accurate when distinguishing real from AI-synthesized faces, and a multimodal study in 2025 showed a 49.4% accuracy for images. While machine detectors are successful in highly controlled benchmarks, cross-generator generalization, compression, resizing and model evolution are ongoing problems. The central issue no longer just has to be whether a specific image is bogus, the review says. The more fundamental issue is that the question of convincing undermines the presumption of all images, even of a real object, and particularly the presumption of their verisimilitude. Detection must not therefore be the primary concern for authentication. New systems like C2PA Content Credentials and SynthID move the issue away from the pixel to the origin and transformations, but don't validate semantic verity. The paper argues that visual trust is transforming from an indexical to a chain of custody model (provenance, forensic analysis, contextual verification, institutional accountability). |
| Keywords | Generative AI, Visual Trust, Photography, Deepfakes, Image Forensics, Provenance, C2PA, Synthetic Media |
| Field | Computer > Artificial Intelligence / Simulation / Virtual Reality |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 5, September-October 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-10-14 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals