International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
ISC-AISGF-TBRF
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICRTET-4
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 6
November-December 2026
Indexing Partners
A Quality-Control and Multimodal Clinical Intelligence (QC-MCI) Framework for Improving Reliability and Clinical Integration in AI-Enabled Radiology Workflows
| Author(s) | Oyindamola Adebayo |
|---|---|
| Country | United States |
| Abstract | Artificial intelligence (AI) is moving from image classification experiments into radiology worklists, reporting systems and clinical decision support. The central implementation problem is no longer whether an algorithm can produce a strong score on a retrospective test set. It is whether the combined system—data, software, radiologist, workflow and governance—continues to produce safe and useful decisions when it encounters routine clinical variation. This article proposes a Quality-Control and Multimodal Clinical Intelligence (QC-MCI) framework for that problem. The framework treats reliability as a property of the complete clinical pathway rather than of the model alone. It combines five linked functions: input quality control; multimodal clinical context integration; model and subgroup validation; human–AI interaction control; and continuous post-deployment monitoring with escalation. The framework is grounded in pre-April 2023 evidence and guidance, including radiology workflow studies, external-validation research, studies of hidden stratification and underdiagnosis bias, and the CLAIM, CONSORT-AI, SPIRIT-AI and DECIDE-AI reporting standards. Practical radiology studies have shown that AI assistance can reduce reading time or improve reader performance in defined settings, but they also show why local validation, clear operating procedures and monitoring are necessary. QC-MCI therefore recommends a staged pathway: verify the input, interpret image and clinical context together, test performance across relevant subgroups and sites, expose AI output at a controlled point in the reader’s workflow, record disagreement and overrides, and pause or recalibrate the system when safety signals emerge. The framework is a proposal for implementation and evaluation, not evidence that a particular AI product improves patient outcomes. Its value lies in making the quality-control and clinical-integration tasks explicit, measurable and assignable. |
| Keywords | Radiology; artificial intelligence; multimodal clinical intelligence; quality control; clinical workflow; external validation; human–AI interaction; patient safety; dataset shift |
| Field | Engineering |
| Published In | Volume 5, Issue 2, March-April 2023 |
| Published On | 2023-03-03 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i02.89794 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals