International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160   •   Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 8, Issue 6 (November-December 2026) Submit your research before last 3 days of December to publish your research paper in the issue of November-December.

A Quality-Control and Multimodal Clinical Intelligence (QC-MCI) Framework for Improving Reliability and Clinical Integration in AI-Enabled Radiology Workflows

Author(s) Oyindamola Adebayo
Country United States
Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) is moving from image classification experiments into radiology worklists, reporting systems and clinical decision support. The central implementation problem is no longer whether an algorithm can produce a strong score on a retrospective test set. It is whether the combined system—data, software, radiologist, workflow and governance—continues to produce safe and useful decisions when it encounters routine clinical variation. This article proposes a Quality-Control and Multimodal Clinical Intelligence (QC-MCI) framework for that problem. The framework treats reliability as a property of the complete clinical pathway rather than of the model alone. It combines five linked functions: input quality control; multimodal clinical context integration; model and subgroup validation; human–AI interaction control; and continuous post-deployment monitoring with escalation. The framework is grounded in pre-April 2023 evidence and guidance, including radiology workflow studies, external-validation research, studies of hidden stratification and underdiagnosis bias, and the CLAIM, CONSORT-AI, SPIRIT-AI and DECIDE-AI reporting standards. Practical radiology studies have shown that AI assistance can reduce reading time or improve reader performance in defined settings, but they also show why local validation, clear operating procedures and monitoring are necessary. QC-MCI therefore recommends a staged pathway: verify the input, interpret image and clinical context together, test performance across relevant subgroups and sites, expose AI output at a controlled point in the reader’s workflow, record disagreement and overrides, and pause or recalibrate the system when safety signals emerge. The framework is a proposal for implementation and evaluation, not evidence that a particular AI product improves patient outcomes. Its value lies in making the quality-control and clinical-integration tasks explicit, measurable and assignable.
Keywords Radiology; artificial intelligence; multimodal clinical intelligence; quality control; clinical workflow; external validation; human–AI interaction; patient safety; dataset shift
Field Engineering
Published In Volume 5, Issue 2, March-April 2023
Published On 2023-03-03
DOI https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i02.89794

Share this